Follow on Google News News By Tag Industry News News By Place Country(s) Industry News
Follow on Google News | ![]() D4DPR Obtains Win for Transparency and Accountability Against DEA in Cannabis Rescheduling CaseIn the D4DPR v. DEA case, the Government disclosed previously withheld DEA communications with individuals that sought to participate in the hearing. The disclosed documents provided transparency into the selection process and revealed that DEA engaged in communications with several applicants before formal selections were made. "This disclosure was a major win for transparency and accountability," Coverage of the court's findings appeared in the March 10, 2025 MJBiz article, "Suspicions that DEA rigged rescheduling process fueled by court documents," which detailed how these unauthorized communications raised serious concerns about the integrity of the rescheduling process. While D4DPR considered further pursuing the challenge to its exclusion from the hearing, doing so could have resulted in more delay. Recognizing the core objective had been met, D4DPR filed a motion to dismiss its petition without prejudice on April 9, 2025, which the court granted on April 11, 2025. This preserves D4DPR's right to refile the case should DEA ultimately not reschedule cannabis. "We remain committed to advocating for evidence-based drug policy," added Dr. Adinoff. "This legal effort exposed fundamental flaws in the DEA's process and reinforced the need for a more transparent, science-driven approach to drug scheduling." D4DPR extends its sincere gratitude to Austin Brumbaugh of Yetter Coleman LLP for leading the organization's legal efforts in this matter. For further information on D4DPR's position on cannabis rescheduling, legal filings, and broader drug policy reform efforts, please visit https://www.d4dpr.org/ End
|
|