"Boeing's 22-Year-264 months & 8,036 days: Certification Monopoly: 8,300–12,500 Aircraft Flying Without True Independent Inspection""

NEW YORK - Aug. 11, 2025 - PRLog -- MEDIA OUTLETS ATTENTION:

--MEDIA OUTLETS HEED THIS DISASTROUS WARNING!--

If you do not heed the warnings presented on Capital Hill April 17,2024 by Daryl Guberman, a 40-year quality expert and shareholder https://www.newstribune.com/photos/2024/apr/18/3749044/ , If another aircraft incident occurs due to the issues outlined here, the burden of responsibility will not rest solely with Boeing — it will also fall upon those within the information chain who chose to ignore or suppress these facts.

This is a professional opinion based on documented industry practices, historical records, and publicly available information. This statement is not an accusation of criminal or civil liability, but a formal call for immediate public disclosure and scrutiny.

For more than two decades, Boeing has quietly dismantled independent safety oversight in aviation — replacing it with a certification monopoly that has left between 8,300 and 12,500 aircraft in service without the traditional on-site inspections that once served as a safety cornerstone. ANSI-American National Standards Institute & ANAB-American National Accreditation Board (ANSI took over complete control of ANAB in 2018) ANSI-ANAB founded IAF(International Accreditation Forum incorporated in Delaware- its sister organization in Australia is ILAC- International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation) IAF& ILAC are associations of accreditation bodies national and international equivalent to ANSI-ANAB who are their underwriters. This means any systematic or product failure ANSI-ANAB are responsible for.

The chain reaction began in the shadow of the September 11, 2001 attacks.

April 2002: Boeing issued a supplier bulletin mandating that all suppliers performing special processes — including heat treating, welding, and non-destructive testing — must hold NADCAP (National Aerospace and Defense Contractors Accreditation Program) certification. The cost and complexity of obtaining NADCAP pushed out smaller suppliers, while shifting control to a centralized certification authority.

July 2002: Boeing issued another supplier bulletin, again just months after 9/11, announcing a major shift in quality oversight. The bulletin stated that suppliers were to send in their certifications and ship their parts, and that Boeing would only send a team to visit a facility "if need be, or need arises." This same bulletin explicitly announced the reduction — and in many cases elimination — of Supplier or Source Inspection, Boeing's traditional in-person supplier quality audit program.

These changes meant that thousands of supplier facilities went years without a single Boeing quality inspector ever setting foot on site.

By October 2003, Boeing, in cooperation with ANSI–ANAB, launched the OASIS Online Aerospace System Information System database, locking suppliers into a system where only those listed — and paying fees — could participate. This effectively created a "pay-to-play" gateway to the aerospace market. OASIS was run by IAQG the International Aerospace Quality Group run at that time by Boeing.

The crisis deepened in 2009 when the FAA granted Boeing Organization Designation Authorization (ODA), effectively allowing the company to self-certify its own aircraft and technologies — including the MCAS system, later linked to the deaths of over 300 passengers in the 2018–2019 Ethiopian and Indonesian airline disasters. Some individuals served simultaneously as Boeing and FAA employees, drawing their paychecks from Boeing. In effect, this made Boeing's CEO a de facto FAA administrator — a fact the company and much of the media have avoided acknowledging. The DOJ an ANSI-ANAB board member and customer, has since stated Boeing lied to the FAA about MCAS. If Boeing was, in practice, made an arm of the FAA in 2009, one chilling question remains: Did they even have to disclose the MCAS installation and its design flaws? This is the textbook definition of a conflict of interest.

Daryl Guberman Quote:

"This is the largest industrial scam ever perpetrated worldwide," says Daryl Guberman, a 40-year quality expert and Boeing shareholder. "Boeing didn't just eliminate competition; they eliminated the independent oversight that kept the skies safe."

Conflict-of-interest concerns are heightened by the fact that ANSI–ANAB's boards have included representatives from both Boeing and powerful U.S. federal agencies, including the Department of Homeland Security, Department of Justice, Department of Commerce, and the FDA — agencies that should be acting as watchdogs, not sitting alongside the corporations they may one day investigate.

The result:

• Less competition in the supply chain
• Higher costs for entry into the aerospace market
• Reduced independent oversight of safety-critical components
• Thousands of aircraft in service built under self-certification

The public must know: Flying Boeing may mean boarding an aircraft that has bypassed independent inspection entirely.

-BOEING'S 22-YEAR CERTIFICATION MONOPOLY GOVERNMENT, SUPPLIER FRAUD & CONSUMER ENDANGERMENT-

Timeline of Potential Federal Violations, Fraud, and Consumer Endangerment 264 Months • 8,036 Days of Risk to the Flying Public

2002 – The Monopoly Begins

• Boeing forces suppliers to hold AS9100 certification through ANSI/ANAB, creating a closed certification pipeline.
• Boeing itself remains uncertified — yet profits from enforcing the rule on others.
• Likely Violation: Sherman Act / Clayton Act — anti-competitive monopoly & restraint of trade.

2003–2008 – Fraud by Omission

• Federal contracts flow to Boeing under the assumption it meets the same standards imposed on suppliers.
• Boeing fails to disclose its lack of AS9100 compliance to the FAA, DoD, or federal procurement agencies.
• Likely Violation: False Claims Act — misrepresenting compliance to obtain taxpayer-funded contracts.

2009 – The Self-Certification Bombshell

• FAA grants Boeing Organization Designation Authorization (ODA) — power to self-certify airworthiness.
• Some inspectors hold dual Boeing/FAA roles, paid by Boeing.
• Boeing becomes, in effect, its own regulator — a direct conflict of interest.
• Likely Violation: 18 U.S.C. § 1001 — false statements & concealment of material facts from federal agencies.

2010–2017 – Monopoly Entrenchment

• Boeing expands the ANSI/ANAB choke-hold on suppliers.
• Still no AS9100 certification for Boeing, yet no regulator intervenes.
• Likely Violation: Procurement Integrity Act — misleading government on quality assurance systems.

2018–2019 – The Deadly Consequences

• Two MCAS-driven crashes (Lion Air & Ethiopian Airlines) kill over 300 people.
• DOJ later states Boeing lied to the FAA about MCAS design.
• Likely Violation: Fraud Against the United States — concealing life-critical safety flaws from regulators and the public.

2020–2023 – Warning Signs Ignored

• Multiple high-profile Boeing quality failures — doors blowing out, fuselage cracks, and contamination inside aircraft.
• Still no AS9100 certification for Boeing, despite 22 years of supplier enforcement.
• FAA and Congress remain silent.

2024 –22 years, 264 months, 8,036 days of the Monopoly

• Boeing reaches 22 years, 264 months, 8,036 days without AS9100 certification.
• 8,300 to 12,500 aircraft have been delivered without true, independent on-site Boeing inspection.
• Public Safety Risk: Millions of passengers have flown on aircraft produced under a double standard.
• Core Question: How can the FAA and DOJ ignore a prime contractor who enforces standards it refuses to meet?

To AS9100 suppliers worldwide: Boeing Screwed You All for 22 Years — Was It Worth The Ride?

https://youtu.be/j1NTytGNWaw



Articles for Reference:

22 Years Of Fraud: AS9100 Suppliers BETRAYED By Boeing And ANSI-ANAB — A Call For A Class Action Lawsuit https://www.prlog.org/13080085-22-years-of-fraud-as9100-suppliers-betrayed-by-boeing-and-ansi-anab-call-for-class-action-lawsuit.htm l

The Largest Industrial Scam Ever Perpetrated Worldwide Started With Boeinghttps://www.prlog.org/13092416-the-largest-industrial-scam-ever-perpetrated-worldwide-started-with-boeing.html#

Before You Fly: QA Expert & Boeing Shareholder DARYL GUBERMAN Exposes Hidden Dangers The Public (Business Owners), FAA, and DOJ Turn a Blind Eye to Boeing's Fake Quality & Safety Certifications—Now We Know Why https://www.prlog.org/13088849-before-you-fly-qa-expert-boeing-shareholder-daryl-guberman-exposes-hidden-dangers.html#

The Certification Conspiracy: How Boeing Faked Aerospace Quality for 20 Years and Forced Everyone Else to Pay for It https://www.prlog.org/13079809-the-certification-conspiracy-how-boeing-faked-aerospace-quality-for-20-years-and-forced-everyone-else-to-pay-for-it.html