Amendment of Russian Anti-Corruption Law to Require Prevention Compliance Programs

: In May 2007, Russia opened discussions to join the OECD Convention on combating bribery of foreign public officials in international business transactions.
 
March 21, 2013 - PRLog -- In May 2007, Russia opened discussions to join the OECD Convention on combating bribery of foreign public officials in international business transactions.(1) Since then, several legislative changes related to anti-corruption have occurred.(2) The last modification is the adoption of the Federal Anti-Corruption Act on the 25 December 2012 entitled “the requirement of organizations to take measures to prevent corruption”.

This Act amended the 2008 Law, notably through article 13.3 which entered into force on January 1st, 2013. This article states that companies need to:

1. Designate departments and structural units and officers who will be responsible for the prevention of bribery and related offenses;

2. Adopt protocols on cooperating with law enforcement authorities;

3. Develop and implement standards and procedures designed to ensure ethical business conduct;

4. Adopt a code of ethics and professional conduct for all employees;

5. Create a means for identifying, preventing and resolving conflict of interest; and

6. Prevent the creation and use of false or altered documents.

Following the example of the UK Bribery Act, this legislative reform brings far-reaching consequences.  Like the hallmarks of effective compliance programs released through the FCPA guidance (3) by the DOJ and the SEC in November 2011, organizations in Russia are now legally required to design anti-corruption compliance programs.(4)

Implications for Companies

This is a major change because failure to comply with the new legislative standard could lead to companies being held liable for ‘failing to take all measures within their powers’. Unlike the UK Bribery Act which contains adequate procedure defense, nothing comparable appears in the new Russian Law and no guidance has been provided.

Although the Russian federation does not provide for criminal sanctions against legal persons (5), administrative fines constitute effective penalties given the maximum level applicable is wide ranging, which can be as high as up to 100 times the value of the illegal advantages given, offered or promised. This is also applicable to actions conducted on the behalf or in the interest of the legal entity.

Therefore domestic corporations and foreign companies operating in Russia should first evaluate their existing local compliance program (if any). Then, depending on their findings, they may need to add any element missing according to the new amendment of article 13.3. Finally, organizations have to assess whether their programs are well-implemented to be sure that it satisfies article 13.3.  

Considering the content of measures required, various issues are at stake such as conflict of interest management. Another source of difficulty is relationships with third parties: all business partners have to be aware of the new regulation which means that companies may encounter difficulties when they plan interactions with counterparties which lack compliance program within their organizations.

Level of Corruption in Russia

Despite the challenges that Russia is facing to fight corruption - in the 2012 Transparency International Corruption Perception Index, Russia was ranked 133 out of 174 with a score of 28 out of 100 – this evolution demonstrates the efforts made to comply with OECD Convention requirements.(6) At the Davos Summit at the end of January 2013, Prime Minister Vladimir Putin stated that 50,000 investigations have been opened. For the year of 2012 in the district of Moscow, 2,000 cases have been initiated.

To moderate these numbers, the Supreme Court stated in January 2013 that only 250 Russians have been charged with major bribery (exceeding 10,000 rubbles (i.e. 330 USD) in 2012).

A Supreme Court representative said 1,300 cases have been dealt with in 2012 (in comparison with 1,500 cases in 2009). 60% of the 1,300 offenders involved were sentenced for taking less than 5,000 rubbles. Teachers and doctors account for 22% of these small bribe cases.

Russia is considering ratifying the Council of Europe's 1999 anti-bribery convention in 2013. Will this new way of approaching the fight against corruption be fully enforced?

Recommended Action

Corporations operating in Russia seeking safeguards may look at the process of certification according to the standard BS 10500:2011 Anti-Bribery Management System (ABMS) which has been designed in order to respond and document the “Adequate Procedure” defense in the aftermath of the entry into force of the UK Bribery Act.  

SGS Anti-Corruption Services (http://www.sgs.com/en/Sustainability/Economic-Sustainability/Anti-Corruption-and-Bribery/Anti-Corruption-Consultancy-Services.aspx) is performing Corruption Prevention Audits and remains at your disposal for any query on this issue.

Contact details:

SGS Consumer Testing Services


Anti-Corruption Services
Emmanuel Chosson

Anti-Corruption Compliance Analyst  
29, avenue Aristide Briand
94111 Arcueil Cedex

t: +33 1 41 24 87 16
Email: cts.media@sgs.com
Website: http://www.sgs.com/en/Sustainability.aspx  

SGS is the world’s leading inspection, verification, testing and certification company. SGS is recognized as the global benchmark for quality and integrity. With more than 75 000 employees, SGS operates a network of over 1 500 offices and laboratories around the world.
End
Source: » Follow
Email:***@sgs.com Email Verified
Tags:Sgs, Anti Corruption, Anti-corruption Law, Anti-bribery Law
Industry:Business
Location:Russian Federation
Subject:Reports
Account Email Address Verified     Account Phone Number Verified     Disclaimer     Report Abuse
SGS Consumer Testing Services PRs
Trending News
Most Viewed
Top Daily News



Like PRLog?
9K2K1K
Click to Share