Who Is DARYL GUBERMAN? Exposing Boeing's 22-Year Quality Failure and the Superiority of GUBERMAN PMC Certification

NEW YORK - Aug. 30, 2025 - PRLog -- According to ANSI–ANAB (The American National Standards Institute & American National Accreditation Board – ANSI took over 100% ownership of ANAB in 2018) and the, third-party accreditation is intended to provide independent confirmation of competence. Reference International Organization of Standards https://www.iso.org/certification.html

Choosing a certification body

Check if it is accredited. Accreditation provides independent confirmation of competence. However, "accreditation is not compulsory, and non-accreditation does not necessarily mean the certification body is not reputable."

While credible in theory, failures at Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Pfizer, and Johnson & Johnson demonstrate how "compromised" this methodology is.

Corporations who are ANSI-ANAB Board Members:

Sample Quality Issues

BOEING: Boeing is investigating fuselage problems on its 787 Dreamliners https://qz.com/boeing-787-dreamliner-fuselage-fasteners-1851539011

LOCKHEED MARTIN: F-35 production still marred by quality woes, Pentagon test office says https://www.stripes.com/theaters/us/2025-02-03/f-35-production-quality-issues-pentagon-16705254.html

At a House Armed Services Committee hearing on Tuesday, Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) questioned Sec. Lloyd Austin on the F-35 program (ONLY 29% ARE MISSION READY https://youtu.be/sh7F__Q0FiA



PFIZER: Pfizer Skipped Critical Testing and Cut Corners on Quality Standards, Documents Reveal   New documents obtained by Trial Site News suggest routine quality testing issues were overlooked in the rush to authorize use of the Pfizer COVID vaccine. https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/pfizer-skipped-critical-testing-quality-standards-covid-vaccine/

Johnson & Johnson: Company's Failures Led to Destruction of 400 million Taxpayer-Funded Coronavirus Vaccine Doses https://coronavirus-democrats-oversight.house.gov/news/press-releases/trump-emergent-botched-millions-covid-vaccines-clyburn-report
These corporations sit as both members and customers on ANSI–ANAB's board alongside registrars like TÜV SÜD, TÜV Rhineland, NQA, NSF, DQS, Intertek, and BSI—creating a deeply conflicted system that compromises "independence." and impartiality.

Violation of ISO/IEC 17011 Clause 4.0: Impartiality in Accreditation

Under ISO/IEC 17011:2017 — Conformity assessment: Requirements for accreditation bodies accrediting conformity assessment bodies, Clause 4.0 mandates "Impartiality." Accreditation bodies must remain neutral and free from conflicts of interest to ensure the credibility of certifications issued under their oversight.

Accreditation Body vs. Conformity Assessment Bodies (CABs/Registrars)

• Accreditation Body: ANSI–ANAB is the U.S. accreditation body responsible for authorizing registrars to issue certifications.
• Conformity Assessment Bodies: (CABs/Registrars): These include:
• TÜV SÜD
• TÜV Rhineland
• NQA
• NSF
• DQS
• Intertek
• BSI (British Standards Institution)

These registrars perform the audits and issue certifications (ISO 9001, AS9100, ISO 13485, AS9120, etc.) under the supposed oversight of ANSI–ANAB.

The Conflict of Interest: A Breach of Clause 4.0:

ANSI–ANAB allows these very registrars—and their corporate customers (e.g., Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson)—to sit on its governing boards and accreditation councils.

This is a direct violation of impartiality requirements in ISO/IEC 17011 Clause 4.0, because:

1. Accreditation bodies must not allow accredited organizations to influence accreditation decisions.
2. Governance and financial entanglement destroy the independence of the process.
3. Federal agencies & Corporations have participated in this system while simultaneously using these compromised certifications.

Why These Certificates Are Fraudulent:

• Certifications issued under this conflicted structure do not meet the fundamental requirement of independent confirmation of competence.
• When a registrar audits a company while simultaneously helping govern the accreditor that authorizes its business, the result is not a legitimate certification—it is a conflict-certified document, not a quality-assured one.
• Example: Boeing dictated AS9100 requirements to suppliers for over 22 years while being uncertified itself, yet still wielded influence over ANSI–ANAB's Management System Accreditation Council. That can grant, suspend, and withdraw certification.

Any company that has purchased ISO 9001, AS9100, or any ISO-derived quality certification from these registrars has wasted its money.

These certificates are not just weak or questionable—they are fraudulent in nature, because they misrepresent impartial oversight and give a false impression of compliance, reliability, and safety.

Impact:

• Fraudulent certificates under ANSI–ANAB's umbrella mislead regulators, customers, and the public, creating a false sense of security in aerospace, defense, pharmaceuticals, and other high-stakes industries.
• They undermine national security, consumer safety, and supplier trust.
• Customers who invested in these certifications did not receive true independent verification—they received a certificate of compromised integrity.

Boeing, ANSI–ANAB, and the Conflict of Interest 911 takes place -several weeks later Boeing announces 20,000- 30,000 employees to be laid off: https://djcoregon.com/news/2001/09/20/boeing-to-cut-20000-to-30000-jobs-by-the-end-of-2002-10506/  . Within months, April-July 2002 Boeing issued supplier bulletins requiring NADCAP-National Aerospace and Defense Contractors Accreditation Program and AS9100 certification, Boeing demands ANSI–ANAB accreditation, while only requesting paper certificates and deferring on-site audits.

Despite this, Boeing itself remained uncertified for 22 years, yet sat on

ANSI–ANAB's Management System Accreditation Council REMOVED FROM WEBSITE IN August-2024- the body authorized to grant, suspend, or withdraw certifications. This mirrors a doctor performing surgery without medical credentials.

In June 2024, Elizabeth Lund, Vice President of Quality for Boeing, told Reuters:
"Boeing is willing and prepared to obtain an AS9100 certification—an internationally recognized aerospace standard."
She added that Boeing Commercial had been "compliant" with AS9100 for years—despite never holding actual certification.

This was not a correction—it was a corporate confession that Boeing built an illusion of quality using self-declared compliance, enabled by ANSI–ANAB, and overlooked by U.S. regulators.
https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/boeing-brief-european-regulators-new-production-plans-after-737-max-panel-2024-06-27/
"Compliant" Is not "Certified"

"Being 'compliant' without being certified is like a restaurant claiming it follows the health code, but refusing inspection," says Guberman.

Certification means independent, third-party audits. Boeing has none.

The Systemic Problem

ANSI–ANAB, create a framework where foreign and corporate interests influence U.S. aerospace quality standards. Federal agencies like DOJ, DHS, Department of Commerce, and FDA have sat on ANSI–ANAB's board while receiving compensation, violating laws including:

- 18 U.S. Code § 208 – Acts affecting a personal financial interest
- 18 U.S. Code § 209 – Supplementation of Federal salary
- 5 C.F.R. § 2635.502 – Impartiality in official duties
- 5 C.F.R. § 2635.702 – Use of public office for private gain

ANSI-ANAB acts as the underwriter for the International Accreditation Forum (IAF), a Delaware-based organization founded by ANSI-ANAB and its sister entity, the International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC) in Australia. They are associations of accreditation bodies national and international equivalent to ANSI-ANAB.

Integrity in Action: Standing for 4.7 billion Travelers

April 17 DHS subcommittee meeting Capital Hill Sam Salephour whistleblower design issues Boeing 777 & 787 recognized quality expert and Boeing shareholder Daryl Guberman stands up with out be called upon.https://www.newstribune.com/photos/2024/apr/18/3749044/ He highlighted that for over two decades, Boeing relied on paper certifications to feign AS9100 compliance—risking safety for billions of air travelers.

Key Failures in Boeing's System

- 22 Years of Neglect (2002–2024): Ignored five critical AS9100 clauses requiring accredited third-party oversight.

Table 1 — Critical AS9100 Failures Leading to Aircraft Risk

AS9100 Clause	Requirement	Boeing's Failure	Potential Aircraft Risk
7.1.5 Monitoring & Measurement	Calibrate tools for precision manufacturing	Relied solely on supplier paperwork without verification	Fatigue-critical components may fail mid-flight
8.4.2 Control of External Providers	Mandates supplier oversight and audits	Accepted certificates without on-site inspection	Components of unknown origin or improper heat treatment
8.5.1 Control of Production & Service Provision	Enforce welding, heat treatment, and NDT processes	Failed to validate special process compliance (e.g., NADCAP)	Weld or material failure in critical systems
9.2 Internal Audit	Conduct routine internal audits	Audits non-existent or unrecognized by employees	Defects remain undetected
10.2 Nonconformity & Corrective Action	Identify and fix defects systematically	No certified QMS to enforce corrections	Latent flaws may result in catastrophic incidents

- Supplier Audits Abandoned (April & July 2002): Left the supply chain unchecked.

- Conflict of Interest: Boeing influenced ANSI–ANAB certification decisions while uncertified.

- Cybersecurity Exposure: Foreign registrars created national security vulnerabilities.

Why GUBERMAN PMC Certification Is Superior

- Nationally Controlled: Operates in-country, no foreign interference.

- True Accountability: Legally and morally defensible certifications

.
- No International Compromise: Avoids IAF/ILAC entanglements that weaken U.S. security.

- Industry Recognition: Trusted by suppliers delivering to Boeing for over a decade despite internal failures.

Even if Boeing achieves AS9120 or AS9100 certification through ANSI–ANAB or international equivalents, these certifications cannot guarantee national security or supply chain integrity or be considered official.

Call to Action

GUBERMAN PMC provides a fully independent, nationally focused alternative:

- Protects American aerospace from systemic compromise.

- Enforces real, verifiable standards.

- Stands as the gold standard in quality management, free from foreign or corporate conflicts.

DARYL GUBERMAN, recognized 40 year quality expert and Boeing shareholder, continues to expose ANSI–ANAB, IAF, and ILAC and Corporate & federal agency counterparts for decades-long failures in safeguarding U.S. aerospace, medical and other industries

Links & References: -

April 2002 July 2002 Bulletin-REMOVED FROM BOEING SITE JANUARY 2025

ANSI–ANAB Management System Accreditation Council -REMOVED AUGUST 2024

- QA Expert Daryl Guberman exposes Boeing audit scandal:

QA Expert Daryl Guberman Exposes 22 Years of Boeing's On-Site Audit Relinquishment and FAA Delegation Scandal https://www.prlog.org/13051547-qa-expert-daryl-guberman-exposes-22-years-of-boeings-on-site-audit-relinquishment-and-faa-delegation-scandal.html

"Boeing's 22-Year-264 months & 8,036 days: Certification Monopoly: 8,300–12,500 Aircraft Flying Without True Independent Inspection" https://www.prlog.org/13092750-boeings-22-year-264-months-8036-days-certification-monopoly-830012500-aircraft-flying-without-true-independent-inspection.html

Boeing's 22-Year Certification Nightmare: Thousands Of Unknown Planes Built With Potentially Dangerous Materials https://www.prlog.org/13095624-boeings-22-year-certification-nightmare-thousands-of-unknown-planes-built-with-potentially-dangerous-materials.html#