Follow on Google News News By Tag Industry News News By Location Country(s) Industry News
Follow on Google News | Wellington Lawyers: Unjustified Fixed-Term Contract Leads to Unjustified DismissalBy: Corelegal At Core Legal Masterton & Wellington, we help both employers and employees navigate complex employment law issues, including the proper use of trial periods and fixed-term agreements. Background of the Case An employee was initially hired under an employment agreement with a 90-day trial period. The employer terminated her within the trial period and then offered her a fixed-term contract while she searched for another job. The fixed-term contract expired after two months. The employee later raised two personal grievance claims for unjustified dismissal. The ERA considered both claims separately:
The 90-Day Trial Period Was Valid The employee argued that the 90-day trial period was invalid because she had previously performed work-related tasks during her job interviews, including assisting customers. However, the ERA ruled that the trial period was valid because:
As a result, her claim for unjustified dismissal based on the trial period clause was dismissed. The Fixed-Term Contract Was Unjustified The ERA then considered whether the fixed-term contract was legally justified. Under New Zealand employment law, fixed-term contracts must have a genuine reason and cannot be used to:
End
|
|