Darwinian evolution found to be unscientific religion

Evolutionists insist evolution is proved science. On this foundation rests liberal theology, progressive politics, Keynesian economics, and permissive morals. Liberal elites and the mass media fiercely defend their worldview and their religion.
By: Dr. Steve Johnston author.com
 
BROOKINGS, Ore. - Nov. 21, 2014 - PRLog -- The myth is that after years of observation Charles Darwin gave a revolutionary new scientific theory which stated life started as a spontaneous cell from a primordial soup, and developed into man through the process of natural selection.

The truth is his book, "The origin of species by means of natural selection" offered nothing new and offered no proofs. Darwin was not a scientist, his only college degree was in theology. He had little or no understanding of genetics or microbiology. He did not know there is no such thing as a "simple cell".

The truth is that the belief in life spontaneously emerging from non-living matter and evolving into man by chance had been taught by his Grandfather Erasmus Darwin, Freemasons, Jacobins, Romans, Greeks, and Babylonians.

In 1859, ironically the same year Charles Darwin's published Origin of Species, Louis Pasteur proved biogenesis, the scientific law that life only arises from living matter. Pasteur disproved the pagan myth of spontaneous generation, that life could originate from inorganic matter.

During the 1860s Gregor Johann Mendel made exhaustive hybridization experiments with peas. He developed what became the modern science of genetics. Genetics is the study of genes, heredity and variation in living organisms. Mendel showed that there are natural limits to biological variations within a species. Variations are possible within a species, such as various breeds of dogs, but "micro" evolution is limited within "kinds" just as the Bible declared. Evolutions have never been able to find "macro" evolution, or transitional hybridization from one species to another.  

In 1952 a graduate student Stanley Miller, under the supervision of Harold Urey, attempted a chemical experiment to prove Oparin's and Haldane's hypothesis that complex organic compounds could have been naturally synthesized from inorganic material. This is considered to be the classic experiment to develop abiogenesis, or a renewal of the idea that life could come from non-living matter.

Miller's objective was not to create life, but to simulate how life's basic building blocks, amino acids, might have formed in early earth. The common myth is that Miller was successful in producing amino acids necessary for life. However, textbooks and the liberal media fail to mention that amino acids synthesized in labs are the wrong type, a mixture of left and right handed amino acids. Only left handed amino acids are used in living organisms. In addition, Miller intentionally eliminated oxygen from the experiment which would have destroyed the amino acids.

Miller and Urey proved nothing because there is no known law of nature or process which can cause information to originate by itself in matter. The DNA code within all plant and animal cells is vastly more compact than any computer chip ever made. Since the density and complexity of the genetic code is millions of times greater then man's present technology, we can conclude that the originator of the information must be supremely intelligent.

What we call "genes" are actually segments of the DNA molecule. DNA, or the genetic code is an information software composed of a molecular string of various nucleic acids (chemical letters) which are arranged in sequences just like the letters found in words and sentences of a book. It is this sequence of nucleic acids in DNA that tells the cells of our body how to construct or build various proteins, tissues, and organs. While amino acids can come into existence by chance, it has never been shown that amino acids can come together into a sequence by chance to form protein molecules. Even the simplest cell is composed of millions of protein molecules.

According to the laws of probability, the chance of nature forming amino acids in the proper sequence and designed by DNA and RNA to form a protein is zero. The evolutionists trust in the immutable God of time to solve all their problems. But matter plus energy and time could never create living protein cells by chance. Sir Frederick Hoyle said the probability of the sequence of molecules in the simplest cell coming into existence by chance is equivalent to a tornado going through a junk yard of airplane parts and assembling a 747 Jumbo Jet. Darwin had no understanding of complexities of modern microbiology.

Harvard biology professor George Wald believed the reasonable view, prior to Louis Pasteur, was to believe in spontaneous generation. The only alternative was to believe in a single primary act of supernatural creation. There is no third position. Prior to his death Wald rejected the possibility of supernatural creation, and despite the impossible odds, he believed in spontaneous generation.

In Romans 1:18-20, the Apostle Paul said, The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of people, who suppress the truth by their wickedness, since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.

Rush Limbaugh said, The "Culture War" is a war of competing worldviews. On one side, you have people who believe in living by a set of divinely inspired moral absolutes. On the other side, you have people who insist morality is simply personal decision.

Frances Schaeffer said the decline in Western morals has been caused by a shift from a Judeo-Christian worldview based upon absolutes toward a world view based upon the idea that final reality is impersonal matter or energy shaped into its present form by impersonal chance.

Frances Schaeffer stated those who hold the material-energy, chance concept of reality, whether Marxist, progressives, or Freudians, not only do not know the truth of final reality, God, they do not know who Man is. They have reduced Man to an arrangement of molecules made by blind chance. They see Man as a competitive animal. They do not understand Man was made in the image of God, with a body soul, spirit and freewill.

Because Man's conscience intuitively knows there is a right and a wrong, he also knows there is a God or creator of morals. Because evolutionist suppress knowledge of God and ignore Man's soul, they end up with despair, hopelessness and lack of purpose for life. They are morally bankrupt without a moral compass. Historians Toynbee and Gibbon observed Pagan godlessness and moral decay leads to the fall of civilizations. A change in worldview to a post-Christian, neo-Darwinian source of reality, has led to a decline in the West. Many believe this will lead to an appointment with destiny, and Man's final war against God, and the Battle of Armageddon.

 

For more information on the war of worldviews see:

Dr. Steve Johnston author.com

Contact
Dr. Stephen Johnston
***@charter.net
End
Source:Dr. Steve Johnston author.com
Email:***@charter.net Email Verified
Tags:Darwian evolution, Evolution Religion, Evolution Unscientific
Industry:Religion, Science
Location:Brookings - Oregon - United States
Account Email Address Verified     Account Phone Number Verified     Disclaimer     Report Abuse
Page Updated Last on: Nov 07, 2016
Tea Party Culture War.com PRs
Trending News
Most Viewed
Top Daily News



Like PRLog?
9K2K1K
Click to Share