Do you like working for a small association or not and why?

AMMAN, Jordan - Nov. 18, 2013 - PRLog -- One of the most important decisions of person's professional life is choosing what size of an association to work at. Large institutions offer a variety of advantages, such as stability, organization and a clear corporate structure. Small start-up companies, on the other hand, may face some problems at first; however, at the same time, they could give you a better chance to prove yourself, show your abilities, and accomplish more tangible achievements. At a smaller association, you may be able to grow with your company and carve out a good future for yourself there, while, at a larger institution, changes may move slower than you would like.

Considering this, Ahmed Essam on Bayt.com Specialties asks, "Would you prefer to work at a big company or a small one, and why?" Ibrahim Salem responds by saying that he believes that start-up companies are the best places to start any career, saying: "You'll be able to measure your success according to clear visual landmarks. Your work will be more agile, as you will work with almost every coworker, allowing you access to more sections of the company and making it easier for you to talk with senior management. Also, your responsibilities will be more versatile."

Andrei Mungiu agrees with him that it is fine to begin a career at a small institution, explaining: "Smaller associations are good for the beginning of your career. Later on, it is common to go for bigger companies or to start your own business."

Javier Lahoz Bardavío also thinks that working for a small company may be best at first, and says that he would not mind being employed at one as they teach flexibility: "Of course I do. Why not? I've always worked for small companies and I am proud of it. More than 80 percent of the companies in Spain are small companies, so it's normal to work at one. They teach you also to be flexible. I mean, you can be a Manager but at the same time, maybe you have to buy paper, take the car or the van to the mechanic, etc.

You also are in closer contact with workers, so you can have direct information of what happens inside the company, what happens with competitors, with your products, and so on."

Some do not believe that there is a clear better option, as both large and small companies have their own advantages and disadvantages. When choosing a job, the only thing that matters is the level of opportunity that comes along with the position, not the size of the company. Amrut Desai responds: "Thank you for your question. The answer could be either way. A small association offers a set of challenges, as does working for a big association. In smaller firms, an employee gets an all-round experience, as he or she may have to don more than one hat. In other words, employees may have to shoulder more responsibilities and be required to attend to diverse tasks, as there are not enough other people available. As such, for gaining all-round experience, a small association offers more chances for quicker growth in skills and status.

On the contrary, in a bigger association, one tends to be compartmentalized and is often assigned to work day in and day out on a single, designated task. In bigger organizations, proper structures of a certain size are put into place in terms of well-defined departments, functions, and work jurisdictions.

As a result, an employee may not be exposed to tasks other than the ones assigned, and may thus take longer to develop a complete understanding of the company and to become a well-rounded player.

When it comes to working for a larger entity, it can be argued that, here, one would have the opportunity to work for a well-known organization or brand that is already established on a national - or even on an international - scale. Bigger firms also offer chances for gaining in-depth knowledge, skills and experience; one could even hope to work abroad if one is employed at a multinational. Experience with a bigger and well-known firm actually offers increased chances of employment and, as a result, one could aim to get higher positions and better salaries.

The answer to your question could actually be yes and no. Both have advantages and disadvantages. It is for the employee to choose, depending on his or her needs."

Nevertheless, there are some people who disagree with the previous answers and who would refuse to work at a small company. Alden Flores says: "It all depends on many aspects, but for me, no. If you were a professional and already in the midst of the managerial or directorate level, you'd have a different view - and that's for a long-term career where you can see yourself retiring with a much bigger association."

We’v heard many different responses and many different opinions – but what do you think? Join the conversation now (http://www.bayt.com/en/specialties/q/30091/do-you-like-wo...) at Specialties Bayt.com!