DHS Proposes the Removal of the International Entrepreneur Rule
After much foreshadowing, the Department of Homeland Security finally announces its proposed removal of the International Entrepreneur Rule.
DHS's Justifications for Ending the IER Parole Program
In its address to eliminating the role, the DHS provided a detailed outline of these criticisms.
PAROLE AS AN INAPPROPRIATE MECHANISM FOR IMPLEMENTING AND ADMINISTERING AN ENTREPRENEUR IMMIGRATION PROGRAM
The DHS has expressed its opinion that the framework of the rule does not adequately promote the current administration's agenda of attracting and retaining the world's most talented entrepreneurs while encouraging investment and innovation in the U.S. It criticizes the discretionary character of the program in contrast to other immigration benefits such as the EB-5 immigrant investor visa, under which if all applicable statutory and regulatory eligibility requirements are met, the agency must approve the petition.
It is for these reasons that the DHS believes that parole doesn't provide the entrepreneur or the qualifying source of capital investment with the certainty or predictability necessary to ensure that a start-up company is a success, thereby ultimately failing to provide a significant public benefit to the United States.
Furthermore, unlike employment-based immigrant and nonimmigrant programs, the DHS complains that parole does not allow for derivative beneficiaries, it resulting that each spouse or child must also demonstrate that accepted entry would serve a significant public benefit.
The DHS goes on to state that, for paroled entrepreneurs who do not qualify for another status upon the time of their parole's expiration, the likely requirement to depart the U.S. may result in them moving their operations abroad which could eliminate possible further benefit to the U.S. and potentially hurt American investors.
ENTREPRENEURS SHOULD CONSIDER USING ALTERNATIVE VISAS OR CONGRESS COULD FACILITATE A PATH FOR THE SOUGHT AFTER INVESTMENT AND INNOVATION
The DHS states and attempts to persuade as to the existence of visa classifications that can be used by qualifying entrepreneurs or investors coming to the U.S. such as the E-2 treaty investor (https://www.calivisa.com/
LIMITED AGENCY RESOURCES & THE DHS'S CURRENT PRIORITIES
The DHS states that President Trump has tasked it with improving existing employment-based visa programs to ensure their integrity and protect the interests of U.S. workers. In reflection of its current processes for adjudicating parole requests, the agency reasons that it would be inappropriate to continue expending limited agency resources for the administration of a parallel and complex regulatory parole framework.
Furthermore, it states that while the monetary costs associated with continuing the program's administration might be recovered over time, it believes that USCIS won't be able to offset the opportunity costs concerning with the diversion of resources necessary for meeting the current administration's priorities regarding, for example, the review of other existing immigration programs, developing new proposed regulatory changes and improving the ability to deter and detect fraud and abuse.
Options for Transitioning Away from the IER Program
The DHS has also outlined options for extricating itself from the IER program.
AUTOMATIC TERMINATION OF THE IER PAROLE PROGRAM ON THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE FINAL RULE
The DHS would amend its regulations to include a provision under which on the effective date of the final rule, parole granted under the IER for all applicable individual entrepreneurs and their dependents would be terminated. This would also include all employment authorizations regardless of expiration dates. Depending on circumstances of the individual whose parole is terminated, including age, the individual may also begin accruing unlawful presence upon the program's termination.
TERMINATION OF THE PAROLE ON NOTICE
In this scenario the DHS would authorize the termination of all parole granted under the IER after notice and provide an opportunity for the entrepreneur and any dependents to demonstrate that parole would otherwise be warranted under the other existing framework.
Furthermore, the issuance of a notice of intent to terminate would create a presumption of termination that the affected individual would have to overcome by demonstrating urgent humanitarian reasons or the continued provision of significant public benefit under 8 CFR 212.5, thus meriting a favorable exercise of discretion. In cases of which this is not the case, there would be no opportunity to appeal a parole termination decision.
REOPENING OF THE IER PAROLE DETERMINATION
Under this option, the DHS would reopen all of the IER parole adjudications itself without fee to the applicant as consistent with 8 CFR 103.5(a)(5) and provide the entrepreneur and his or her dependents with the opportunity to present evidence of eligibility for parole under the existing non-IER parole framework.
EXPIRATION OF INITIAL PERIOD OF PAROLE
In this set of circumstances the DHS would allow the parole approved under the IER to naturally expire along with any associated employment authorization unless otherwise terminated for unrelated reasons.
Full Article: https://www.calivisa.com/
Powell Immigration Law, PC