Silicon Valley Billionaires' Desire To Escape Simulation Universe Maybe Fulfilled By Marshall Barnes

YELLOW SPRINGS, Ohio - Nov. 21, 2016 - PRLog -- Internationally noted R&D engineer and conceptual theorist, Marshall Barnes, has discovered anomalies in quantum behavior suggesting the universe is information based, as posited by late physicist, John Archibald Wheeler of Princeton in his 'it from bit' theory. This discovery will have major impacts on "simulation theory", that we're living in a simulated universe. It's big among Silicon Valley billionaires now rumored to be financing ideas to get out of the simulation. Marshall's research suggests he has the solution and technology and theories to do it.

The main track bringing this all into focus is the October 30th article for the Institute of Ethics and Emerging Technologies (IEET) by Eliott Edge, Breaking Into the Simulated Universe, where he argues escape from the simulated universe would be impossible and the real key is to follow the suggestion of Thomas Campbell, NASA physicist/consciousness researcher, and get into consciousness, since being in a simulation means we're simulated as well. Marshall Barnes has a better argument.

"That's a product of limited thinking," he states. "I know all about consciousness research, particularly because I worked in it from 1972. In 1999, the lab I built was not only for pure research into exotic electromagnetic fields, but consciousness. In 1990 I invented the first psychoactive rock music videos. By 2003, I had begun development of technology like that in, Brainstorm and Strange Days. In 2006, Dr. Itiel Dror of the University of Southampton in the UK, encouraged me to create an alternative field of research separate from cognitive technology, which I call, technocogninetics, which is the study of how things effect human consciousness without feedback. My point is I know what studies in consciousness will do and it's all subjective. Eliott has it all wrong when he states, 'How do you know that the hole you tear in space-time isn't leading you to some other video game world or another?'. The answer is simple - if we're actually just part of a simulation, we won't be able to tear that hole in space-time to begin with and that's the key. I'm already beginning to do that".

Eliott states (see http://ieet.org/index.php/IEET/more/Edge20161030 ), "In an objective reality time does not dilate, space doesn't bend, objects don't teleport and universes don't pop into existence from nowhere. We would not doubt the world's objective reality if only it behaved so physically, but it does not...The world of modern physics doesn't behave at all as an objective reality should." Marshall disagrees.

"That exactly happens in objective reality. We use separate instruments to record or measure these phenomena, that's why they're accepted as part of reality. Only what happens in our heads is subjective. Consciousness is subjective, which is why it's of limited interest to me anymore. I want to control the reality outside my head. Anyone can effect what's inside."

Eliott argues a technological solution won't work. "Although, I admit ignorance regarding what approach these rumored billionaire-encouraged researchers are taking, I will throw in my two cents anyway and claim that making a machine won't work."

"Right there, Eliott admits why his opinion is irrelevant," Marshall continues. "If you don't know the technology then you can't criticize the solution. I nail it - 1. He says though we may be able to detect the anomaly or what kind of simulation we're in, it doesn't mean we can get out. First of all, we're not in a simulation and there's no evidence we are. What we're in is a physical universe based on information, which is not the same. The fact I've detected one of the anomalies, have a device that's opening micro wormholes so RF and IR waves can escape and disappear, suggests the possibility to leave for another universe is within my grasp.  2. What Eliott doesn't realize is being in a computer simulation would most likely prevent a simulated being from manipulating it. That I have technology already doing it, I've detected anomalies suggesting at least we're in a participatory universe, supports my position. The fact nothing seems to be stopping these efforts suggests we're not in a computer simulation. 3. Discovering a way out doesn't suggest we'll just reach another simulation but we're controlling the reality we're in. If we control it, we can escape it and we're not in a simulation".


Marshall's been focused on escaping our time for over 20 years. It's the reason he's concentrated on the nature of time, parallel universes and why he's been so successful with his research, resulting in the Verdrehung Fan™ - the first time machine in the world, as well as his breakthrough experiments with macroscopic incidents of retrocausality.

"People, whose main contact with technology's been through computers, are biased to think that's how everything would ultimately work. I call it digitalcentrism, and they're wrong. What they know about computers, is not the only way computers could exist. They think things will evolve a specific way, technologically, and develop into a specific future. They're wrong - as wrong as the political pundits about the recent presidential election. Those pundits couldn't see beyond their biases. Digitalcentrics are identical. That's why they're wrong - we're not in a simulated world, our universe is founded on information. Philip K. Dick thought events could be "reprogramed in the past", resulting in "alternate universes". Once you learn how to manipulate that information, you can escape. I will escape. I have every intention to."

If the billionires want out, they should contact Marshall (see http://lanyrd.com/profile/paranovation/bio ) before it's too late.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cXV_nMpThk