Medical Groups' Brief Supports Science Behind Pharmacists' Religious Objections

Five associations of medical associations file amicus brief outlining science behind pharmacists' religious objections to Washington State regulation forcing them to dispense emergency contraceptives capable of ending lives of human embryos.
 
 
Spread the Word
Listed Under

Tags:
Conscience
Emergency Contraceptives
Plan B
Ella
Mandate

Industrys:
Health
Legal

Location:
San Francisco - California - US

Nov. 21, 2012 - PRLog -- Five associations of Christian medical professionals filed a brief in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (http://bdfund.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/FILED-BDF-CLS-Stormans-Amicus.pdf) to defend pharmacists against a Washington State regulation that would force pharmacists in that state to dispense abortion-inducing drugs despite their religious and moral convictions.

"At a time when there is a critical shortage of pharmacists, a regulation that forces pharmacists to choose between their jobs and their religious beliefs needlessly threatens the health care of all citizens of Washington State," explained Kim Colby, senior counsel for Christian Legal Society's Center for Law and Religious Freedom.

Attorneys Nikolas T. Nikas and Dorinda Bordlee of the Bioethics Defense Fund consulted with embryologist Maureen L. Condic, PhD in order to advise the court of the science of how the drugs terminate the life of a human being at the embryonic stage of development.  The brief also sets forth basis of the sanctity of human life ethic of the Catholic Church and Christian denominations upon which the Pharmacists base their conscience objections.

In February 2012, a federal district court declared Washington State's regulation unconstitutional because it violated the pharmacists' federal right to freely exercise their religion. The regulation unconstitutionally targets pharmacists' religious objections to dispensing abortifacients, even though any pharmacist may refuse to dispense any drug for various nonreligious reasons. "Singling out religious beliefs for prohibition, while leaving non-religious beliefs unrestricted, is unconstitutional," explained Colby.

The brief filed today urges the Ninth Circuit to affirm the district court's liberty-respecting decision. The friend-of-the-court brief filed in Stormans v. Selecky was joined by Christian Medical Association, American Association of ProLife Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Catholic Medical Association, Association of American Physicians & Surgeons, and Christian Pharmacists Fellowship International.

The brief was prepared by attorneys at the Bioethics Defense Fund (www.BDFund.org) and the Christian Legal Society's Center for Law and Religious Freedom (www.clsnet.org).

Read the BDF-CLS Amicus Brief on the science and religious liberty rights regarding pharmacists' rights of conscience. (http://bdfund.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/FI...)
End
Source:
Email:***@bdfund.org Email Verified
Tags:Conscience, Emergency Contraceptives, Plan B, Ella, Mandate
Industry:Health, Legal
Location:San Francisco - California - United States
Account Email Address Verified     Account Phone Number Verified     Disclaimer     Report Abuse
Page Updated Last on: Nov 21, 2012
Bioethics Defense Fund PRs
Trending News
Top Daily News
Top Weekly News



Like PRLog?
9K2K1K
Click to Share