News By Tag Industry News News By Place Country(s) Industry News
| ![]() UK Public Can Accept More TV Swearing Than You ThinkThe Office of Communication (Ofcom) has concluded from its latest research that the UK Public can accept more swearing than you think.
By: Prime Languages Ofcom commissioned a research to find out what terminologies are accepted by the public and what are considered as offensive. The research was carried out through discussion groups and one on one interview in areas such as Scotland, Wales and England. The research was conducted on a general national sample of 94 participants and 35 participants for research on minority groups. The research aims to help Ofcom staff in determining what terms are accepted as vulgar because they are dealing with complaints from the public about bad languages broadcasted over the air every day. It will give the staff a good idea where the line is drawn in this very grey area. The research report says that words such “loony”, “nutter” or “poof” can be used by programme hosts at any time of the day. Ofcom said the public seemed to be willing to accept or tolerate some mild swearing during the day. However, the F-word is still unwelcomed and prohibited from being used before 9pm every night. And then, there are the medium level swearing words such as “s**t” and “b***h”. The research report suggested that the public has a more relaxed attitude towards these words but there are two schools of thought here. Some adults are against these words being broadcasted before 9pm, while another group would not mind hearing them earlier in the evening. Without much surprise, words such as “f**k” or “c**t” are still considered as highly offensive by the public and should only be broadcasted after 9pm. An interesting fact is that Gordan Ramsay, the infamous bad mouth chef swore for about 240 times, which the F-word appeared 180 times during a 100 minute programme broadcasted on Channel 4. Of course, many parents would be concerned that their children will receive a bad influence from the frequent use of profanity on TV. Many controversial terms such as “mental”, “lezza”, or “Jesus Christ” have also been categorised by Ofcom as socially acceptable. Many have voiced their concerns that the results of the research are going to encourage the public to take a more relaxed view toward TV swearing and also signalling to broadcaster to continue pushing the envelope. The Ofcom research results have been criticised because the methodology of research was biased in that it took too many minority group participants. The critics argued that the research should have been carried out by doing a completely random selection on the public. However, Ofcom has released a statement saying that the organisation does not propose any changes to its already robust rules. The research is aimed to gauge the public’s reaction and their general attitude towards the use of offensive language so that Ofcom can keep monitoring the issue. # # # About Prime Languages: Language translation provider offering Certified Translation, Professional Interpreting and Language Tuition. We are your Global Language Service provider. http://www.primelanguages.com End
|
|