News By Tag
* Thomas A Moore
* Memorial Day
* More Tags...
News By Place
Memorial search: Is there a "nano-thermite at WTC on 9/11" connection to U.S. economic foreclosure?
Why plant thermite at WTC to cause collapse on 9/11. Evidence is compelling according to scientists, but why? Doesn't make sense! But what if? Why are U.S. journalists muzzled?
By: Elsinore Times: firstname.lastname@example.org
Let us assume for the moment that the latest published scientific research is correct--that WTC's were brought down by thermite...then:
WHY PLANT THERMITE? WHAT IS THE CONNECTION TO U.S. GOVERNMENT?
You are invited to contemplate on Memorial Day and discuss via forum indicated below.
NANO-THERMITE CAUSED WTC COLLAPSES on 9/11 -- according to the published scientific paper by Harrit et al:
“Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade
Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones, Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley and Bradley R. Larsen.
A copy of this scientific paper is available at http://www.scribd.com/
A subtitled TV interview with Harrit is available at http://www.youtube.com/
This paper provokes the questions: WHY bring down the WTC skyscrapers?
Elsinore Times interviewed the author of the book “HILLARY” (ISBN#0978602404 ) Dr. Thomas A. Moore, who said, "The HILLARY book traces the history of U.S. government subterfuge where the public is deceived for the sake of a “greater cause” beginning with the secret nuclear explosion at Port Chicago, CA in 1944, to the discovery in the aftermath of the 1994 Northridge L.A. earthquake that Lincoln welds used in most U.S. high-rise are faulty (so many steel high-rise buildings are obsolete/dangerous -- up to the unbelievable official NIST explanations for the three WTC skyscraper collapses on 9/11. (See Hillary” referenced above.)
I have opened a forum at http://www.alpharpublish.com/
The critical events surrounding 9/11 and the economic collapse include:
1. President Clinton had the economy running at a running pitch from 1992 until 2000, effectively milking the economic cow almost dry by the year 2000...also at that time the 1994 LA-Norhridge earthquake demolished the confidence of many structural engineers in our stock of high-rise steel buildings. (Ref. "Hillary.")
2. A controversial election saw President G. W. Bush become the president from 2000 until 2008. See President Bush reference to explosives in WTC in YouTube presentation http://www.youtube.com/
3. The collapse of three high-rise WTC buildings—Presumably the 9/11 terrorists set us at war with Iraq and Afghanistan and lead President Bush to lower interest rates to such low levels that a rush to buy real estate followed... and we also obtained valuable information about the demolition of "obsolete" high-rise steel buildings.
4. Corruption and incompetence amongst bankers and business leaders led to a collapse of credit markets and foreclosures on over-extended borrowers.
5. President Obama elected in 2008 and surely recognized that firstly, China can bankrupt us; and secondly that maybe pollution control and management of U.S. interest rates is probably our best option to resuscitate the economy.
6. Harrit et al reveal that thermite detonated WTC. Copy of scientific paper at http://www.scribd.com/
7. There is a media sense that rigorous investigation of WHY is resisted at this time by the American people (and therefore American journalists)--
8. However, NIST scientists have sometimes lacked rigor, as demonstrated in this YouTube clip: http://www.youtube.com/
9: There are many unexplained issues:
For example--See http://www.debunking911.com/
DEBUNKER is clearly a professional scientist who has exerted a great deal of energy to debunk any suggestion that any form of thermite might be involved.
This is claimed to be a free site yet says:
“Had he (Professor Steven Jones, co-author of paper referenced above.) been just an average Internet poster I would let this go as gross ignorance of how the scientific method works, but not a professor. I am left to draw no other conclusion than Steven Jones is purposely deceiving his flock or he has a serious mental disease. What other conclusion can a one draw? Sloppy research or purposeful deception by the "scholars"? The evidence for one is growing... Thanks to Shagster, Scott S. and David B. Benson for their research.”
Why so much energy for the cause of vilifying Professor Jones and other scientists who have been suspicious of the NIST storyline—a suspicion that has been demonstrated to be merited—the presentation of the scientists, Harrit et al, investigating the possibility of a thermite-like product involved in the WTC collapses on 9/11have shown valid reason for suspicion—and should not be regarded as… “Looney-tunes who should be in a psychiatric hospital.” It is important to be respectful of the arguments of others as the search for truth continues... yet recently there has been muzzling and censorship of U.S. journalists--