The NADCAP Chain Reaction: How Post 9/11 Policy, Industry Self Policing, and a 2018 Accreditation Breach Put Aerospace Safety in Freefall40 Year Quality Systems Expert And Boeing Shareholder Daryl Guberman Exposes How Boeing's April 2002 NADCAP Mandate, The Rise Of ICOP, And A Single 2018 Accreditation Misrepresentation Quietly Destabilized Global Aerospace Conformity.
Boeing's Mandate Exposed A System Built To Fail Acronym Definitions Essential acronyms used throughout this press release:
If your company performs NADCAP special processes,heat treat, welding, coatings, plating, chemical processing, NDT, or materials testing — you need to understand something the accreditation world never told you: Your NADCAP certification has been compromised since 2018. Not because of your audit. Not because of your procedures. But because ANAB perpetrated a fraud stating itself as an underwriter ISO/IEC 17011 — Accreditation Body Competence Standard the underwriter designation is forbidden. On a U.S. Department of State contract 19AQMM18R0131 which contaminated the entire global accreditation chain — including every MRA and MLA equivalent accreditation body worldwide. I'm Daryl Guberman, a 40‑year aerospace quality‑systems expert and Boeing shareholder. Over the past twenty-plus years, I've uncovered structural vulnerabilities inside the accreditation ecosystem that governs aerospace conformity, special‑process oversight, and supplier certification in all industries worldwide. Independent Voice America Couldn't Silence: A 40‑Year Aerospace Expert Turned Media Force https://www.prlog.org/ These findings reveal how the Performance Review Institute (PRI) — and its flagship program, NADCAP — became entangled in a contaminated accreditation chain following ANAB's 2018 misrepresentation. What NADCAP Is — And Why It Matters NADCAP oversees critical special processes: heat treat, welding, NDT, chemical processing, coatings, materials testing, and fastener/metals manufacturing. NADCAP audits special processes — but does not certify quality management systems. PRI itself must hold valid ISO‑based conformity certifications issued by ANAB or an ANAB‑equivalent IAF MLA member. The GUBERMAN Anomaly Discovery https://www.prlog.org/ When ANAB's accreditation chain becomes contaminated, PRI becomes contaminated, and NADCAP becomes contaminated. Boeing's Post‑9/11 Oversight Collapse — And the NADCAP Substitution After 9/11, Boeing issued two supplier bulletins that reshaped aerospace conformity. April 2002 — NADCAP Mandate Suppliers were required to obtain NADCAP accreditation for heat treat and welding. Boeing stated NADCAP would reduce redundant audits and that business would only continue with NADCAP‑accredited processes. How Boeing's 2002 Mandates Exposed a Collapse https://www.prlog.org/ July 2002 — AS9100 Mandate Boeing required suppliers to be certified to AS9100 — accredited by ANAB. But Boeing itself:
March 2014 — The Email That Revealed Global Accreditation Contamination The ANAB Vice President — also Chairman of IAF and Principal on the IAF 990 Tax Form— wrote: "All MRA and MLA accreditation bodies are equivalent to ANAB." "Certified once, accepted everywhere." Once ANAB committed fraud on DOS Contract 19AQMM18R0131 in 2018, that doctrine became: "Certified once — rejected everywhere." ANAB Fraud in Contract 19AQMM18R0131 https://www.prlog.org/ Registrars were never informed. Auditors were never informed. Suppliers were never informed. Yet audits continued worldwide under a contaminated- This means aerospace, medical, automotive, environmental, food safety, defense, manufacturing, energy, electronics, pharmaceuticals, transportation, and heavy industry worldwide, all continued being audited under a fraudulent accreditation environment. Auditors unknowingly perpetuated the fraud. Every audit performed after 2018 was built on a fraudulent foundation. Every certificate issued afterward was contaminated. Every conformity claim afterward was invalid. Because Boeing and Airbus rely on MLA/MRA‑accredited suppliers, both received parts from suppliers manufacturing in fraudulent environments — and still are presently. Boeing's 24‑Year Non‑Certification — Confirmed by Leadership On June 27, 2024, Boeing VP of Quality Elizabeth Lund confirmed:
The Structural Consequence — Aircraft Built in an Uncertified Environment Boeing Under a Lens — The GUBERMAN Insight https://guberman- You cannot build an FAA‑regulated aircraft using uncertified materials, uncertified processes, or an uncertified quality system. Once an aircraft is built in a non‑certified environment, no maintenance program can bring it back into conformity. This is the root cause of structural failures:
How NADCAP Became Boeing's Substitute for Missing Certification Because Boeing refused AS9100 certification, it relied on:
ANAB → IAF MLA → PRI → NADCAP → Boeing suppliers → Boeing aircraft ICOP ICOP allowed industry to police itself — bypassing FAA oversight. This enabled in 2018 fraudulent manufacturers, fraudulent quality systems, and fraudulent special processes to be treated as certified.Even though ANAB perpetrated a fraud calling itself and underwriter. FAA Requirements — What the Law Actually Says FAA's governing rules — 14 CFR §21.137, §21.146, and §21.6 — make clear:
Global Impact — Every Industry, Every Certificate, Every Supplier Because ANAB sits inside the IAF MLA/MRA network, contamination spreads automatically. THE PERMANENT CONTAMINATION: Whether you build aircraft, medical devices, pharmaceuticals, cars, electronics, or defense systems — your supply chain is infected. Changing acronyms 2026. from IAF/ILAC to GLOBAC, shifting from AS9100 to AI9100, or hiding behind NADCAP special‑process approvals cannot fix a baseline that was fraudulent from the ground up. The paper trail is broken. The audit lineage is corrupted. The system is trapped — and every attempt to rename it only deepens the lie. No amount of corporate window‑dressing can hide a contamination that began at the foundation and spread unchecked for eight years. "All who rise while burying the truth will one day be buried by it." — Anonymous (proverbial wisdom) Media Contact DARYL GUBERMAN 203-556-1493 ***@yahoo.com 203 556 1493 Photo: https://www.prlog.org/ End
Page Updated Last on: Aug 11, 2026
|
Account Phone Number