Urgent Forensic Alert Submitted To China's CIVIL Aviation Authority40 Year Quality Expert And Boeing Shareholder Daryl Guberman "Warns of Global Accreditation Collapse Affecting Boeing And Airbus Airworthiness"
By: GUBERMAN-PMC,LLC The letter, addressed to Director Guo Qiang of the CAAC's International Cooperation Division, details failures within the ANSI National Accreditation Board (ANAB) and its international MRA/MLA "equivalent" Air India 787 Accident Exposes 24 Year Boeing Certification Collapse: FAA Documentation Confirms Risk of In Flight Engine Shutdown from Faulty Switches https://www.prlog.org/ KEY FINDINGS PRESENTED TO THE CAAC
ISO/IEC 17011 & ISO/IEC 17001 VIOLATIONS ISO/IEC 17011 — Conformity Assessment: Requirements for Accreditation Bodies mandates strict impartiality and prohibits accreditation bodies from acting as underwriters, guarantors, insurers, or financial‑risk entities. ISO/IEC 17001 — Conformity Assessment: Impartiality Principles and Requirements reinforces this prohibition. The designation of ANAB as an "underwriter" This violation renders all AS9100 certifications issued under ANAB between 2018–2026 non‑compliant at the root. Federal Contract Records Reveal ANAB's 14 Year Accreditation Identity Breakdown: DOS 19AQMM18R0131 (2018) and DOJ 15F06725C0000139 (2025)https://www.prlog.org/ BOEING AND AIRBUS IMPLICATIONS If accreditation supporting certification and laboratory testing is invalid, then material certifications and associated parts may be called into question. This warrants independent regulatory review of aircraft produced under those assumptions. https://guberman- Boeing & Airbus 9,000-Airframe Crisis 2018–2026 https://www.prlog.org/ INTERNATIONAL SALES RISK — 500 AIRCRAFT Documentation shows that President Donald Trump and a contingency of major‑industry CEOs — including Boeing CEO Kelly Ortberg — are attempting to sell approximately 500 Boeing aircraft to foreign buyers, including China, despite these aircraft being produced in a non‑certified, AS9100/AI9100 environment. "Trump: Surrounded by Losers — Your Agencies Backed ANAB's 2018 Fraud on Contract 19AQMM18R0131" Guberman stated: "It would be better to build these aircraft out of papier‑mâché QA EXPERT & BOEING SHAREHOLDER DARYL GUBERMAN- DEPOSITION: BOEING-CEO, AIRBUS-CEO & DISTRIBUTION A-J https://youtu.be/- THE JUNE 27, 2024 LUND STATEMENT & THE GUBERMAN DISCOVERY On June 27, 2024, in a Reuters interview, Elizabeth Lund, then Boeing's Vice President of Quality, stated that Boeing was "willing and prepared to obtain AS9100," that the company was "compliant with the AS9100 standard," and that Boeing was "conducting internal audits as if already certified." Acting as both a Boeing shareholder and a 40‑year quality‑systems expert, Daryl Guberman traveled to Boeing's facilities in Everett, Renton, Auburn, and Northfield in Washington State. Over nearly a month on site, he interviewed employees across multiple departments and discovered:
Guberman concluded that Boeing has never maintained AS9100 certification from July 2002 to the present, because even the most basic requirement — conducting internal audits — was not being performed. Boeing, he determined, could not afford to pull workers off the production line, making AS9100 certification structurally impossible. This became the basis of The Guberman Discovery. https://guberman- MATERIAL CHAIN BREAKDOWN — FROM ORE TO AIRCRAFT The certification failure affects the entire chain:
Because the accreditation root is invalid, every step from ore to installation is non‑conforming — and at the end of the process, there is no way to know whether the material delivered is truly 7075 aluminum, 6061 aluminum, or something else entirely. The certification chain is so compromised that the actual material identity cannot be trusted. FAA FRAUD, FALSIFICATION & AIRWORTHINESS REGULATIONS WHY BOEING SHOULD NEVER HAVE BUILT AIRCRAFT UNDER A FRAUDULENT ACCREDITATION ROOT FAA doctrine states: If the root is fraudulent, the part is fraudulent. If the part is fraudulent, the installation is fraudulent. If the installation is fraudulent, the aircraft is fraudulent. And: "There is no waiver, no exception, and no administrative workaround when the foundation itself is fraudulent." This is why Boeing should never have built aircraft under a non‑conforming AS9100/AI9100 accreditation structure. 1. 14 CFR § 3.401–3.415 — Fraudulent, False, or Misleading Statements "No person may make or cause to be made any fraudulent, intentionally false, or misleading statement in any record, report, or application." Why Boeing should never have built aircraft: The underwriter designation on DOS Contract 19AQMM18R0131 (2018) contaminated the entire accreditation root. Every AS9100 certificate, supplier record, material certification, and installation record is fraudulent. This is inclusive of all ISO certifications and derivatives ANAB and their international equivalents in all industries. 2. 14 CFR § 21.2 — Falsification of Applications, Reports, or Records "The FAA may revoke any certificate, production approval, or airworthiness approval obtained by fraudulent, intentionally false, or misleading statements." Why Boeing should never have built aircraft: FAA airworthiness depends on AS9100. If AS9100 is fraudulent, airworthiness collapses with it. 3. 14 CFR § 43.12 — Fraudulent Maintenance Records "No person may make or cause to be made any fraudulent or intentionally false entry in any record." Why Boeing should never have built aircraft: Every part installed between 2018–2026 was produced under fraudulent accreditation. Every installation record is contaminated. A fraudulent installation record = an unairworthy aircraft. 4. 14 CFR § 121.9 — Fraud and Falsification (Air Carriers) "No person may make, or cause to be made, any fraudulent or intentionally false entry in any record or report." Why Boeing should never have built aircraft: Airlines operating these aircraft inherit Boeing's falsification exposure. 5. 14 CFR § 145.12 — Fraudulent or Intentionally False Entries (Repair Stations) "Any fraudulent or intentionally false entry is a basis for suspension or revocation." Why Boeing should never have built aircraft: Repair stations cannot legally maintain aircraft built with fraudulent parts. 6. FAA SUP PROGRAM — Suspected Unapproved Parts Under FAA Order 8120.16 and AC 21‑29D, any part whose certification chain is compromised is classified as a SUP Why Boeing should never have built aircraft: If the accreditation root is fraudulent:
7. THE AIRWORTHINESS MISCONCEPTION Many believe an FAA Airworthiness Certificate supersedes AS9100. It does not.
If the OEM-Original Equipment Manufacturer- This renders the resulting aircraft non‑conforming, unauthorized, and unairworthy. REQUEST TO CAAC Guberman urges the CAAC to initiate an independent fourth‑party forensic audit of all Boeing and Airbus aircraft:
"All who rise while burying the truth will one day be buried by it." -Anonymous (proverbial wisdom) Media Contact DARYL GUBERMAN ***@yahoo.com 203 556 1493 Photos: https://www.prlog.org/ https://www.prlog.org/ https://www.prlog.org/ End
|
Account Phone Number