"FRAUD: Federal Reliance, Regulatory Blindness, ANAB Misrepresentation, Unchecked Conflicts, And Deception -The Guberman DefinitionA Federal Contract Misrepresented ANAB As An Underwriter, Triggering Eight Years Of U.S. And Worldwide Disruption Across Aerospace, Medical, Automotive, Electronics, And Industrial Supply Chains. Forty Year Quality Expert And Boeing Shareholder DARYL GUBERMAN Exposes How Federal Reliance, Regulatory Blindness, And Embedded Conflicts Compromised Certification Integrity And Public Safety.
By: GUBERMAN-PMC,LLC At the heart of his discovery is U.S. Department of State Contract 19AQMM18R0131, where ANAB was described as an underwriter — a term that implies regulatory authority and financial risk assumption. Guberman argues that this description misled agencies and contractors into believing ANAB held powers it does not possess. He refers to this eight‑year period as "The GUBERMAN Anomaly-Discovery. Guberman Anomaly https://guberman- Below is the FRAUD framework he uses to summarize the systemic failures he uncovered: F — Federal Reliance on a Broken Accreditation System According to Guberman's analysis, multiple federal agencies — including the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Department of Justice (DOJ), Department of Commerce (DOC), Department of Transportation (DOT), and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) — were simultaneously board members of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and customers of its accreditation arm, ANAB. PICTURE 3 (ANSI TAX FORM) He argues that this dual role created a structural conflict: agencies responsible for oversight were aligned with the very body they relied on for accreditation integrity. R — Regulatory Blindness That Endangered Every Contract Guberman asserts that federal agencies accepted ANAB‑accredited certifications without independently verifying ANAB's claimed authorities. This regulatory blind spot, he says, affected:
A — ANAB's Misrepresentation Embedded Across Government Contract 19AQMM18R0131 described ANAB as an underwriter. Guberman states that this description: • Influenced federal reliance
U — Unchecked Conflicts Spanning DHS, FAA, DOT, SEC, FAA, FTC, DOD, etc.) Guberman's findings show that these agencies sat on ANSI–ANAB boards while depending on ANAB for accreditation. He argues that this created a closed loop where oversight, enforcement, and accreditation were intertwined — with no independent separation of duties. D — Deception That Compromised Oversight From 2018–Present Guberman states that the misrepresentation on the 2018 contract, combined with federal participation in ANSI–ANAB, created a chain reaction affecting aerospace certification, supplier integrity, and public safety. He argues that this breakdown constitutes a systemic deception that has persisted through 2026. Impact Beyond Aerospace: Every Industry, Every Supplier Globally Guberman emphasizes that this issue is not limited to aerospace. He asserts that any supplier using ANAB accreditation or MLA/MRA‑equivalent accreditation between 2018–2026 may have produced materials whose certification lineage cannot be independently verified. This includes:
He argues that such materials should be quarantined or reevaluated until their certification chain is independently validated. Aerospace: Fixed‑Wing, Rotary‑Wing, and Defense Aircraft Guberman's most serious concern involves aerospace manufacturing, where AS9100 (Aerospace Quality Management System Standard) certifications accredited by ANAB or MLA/MRA equivalents are widely used. He argues:
"No FAA waiver — past, present, or future — can retroactively validate a broken accreditation chain." Historical FAA–Boeing Conflicts Mirror the Same Structural Failures Guberman draws parallels to long‑standing FAA–Boeing issues, including:
Media Silence and Public Accountability Guberman asserts that major news organizations (Bloomberg, Politico, Reuters, etc) have avoided reporting on these findings due to: • Corporate relationships
For decades, forty‑year quality expert and Boeing shareholder Daryl Guberman has watched major media bury stories that threaten their corporate and federal alliances. That's why he uses PRLog — one of the only platforms not controlled by those entanglements. The proof was undeniable on April 17, 2024, when Guberman showed Bloomberg and Politico the 2002 Boeing documents revealing 22 years of abandoned on‑site auditing — now 24 years in 2026 https://www.newstribune.com/ Conclusion Guberman's FRAUD framework is intended to force a national conversation about:
Media Contact DARYL GUBERMAN ***@yahoo.com 203 556 1493 Photos: https://www.prlog.org/ https://www.prlog.org/ https://www.prlog.org/ End
Page Updated Last on: Mar 24, 2026
|
Account Phone Number