Worldwide Recall Warning: ANAB and MRA/MLA Certification Failures Threaten Aerospace,Defense, Cybersecurity, Medical Devices, and Global Supply Chain40 Year Quality Expert- Boeing Shareholder, Systemic Risk Advisor And Forensic Archivist Daryl Guberman releases Evidence Indicating That Products Manufactured Under ANAB And MRA/MLA Equivalent Accreditation From 2018–2026 Are Invalid, Affecting Aircraft, Defense Systems, Medical Devices, Cybersecurity Programs, Food Safety, Plastics, Metals, And Global Supply Chains.
By: GUBERMAN-PMC,LLC According to Guberman's findings, all certifications issued under ANAB (American National Accreditation Board) and its international equivalents operating under the Multi Regional Agreement (MRA) and Multilateral Agreement (MLA) structures may be unreliable from 2018 to the present. MRA-MLA are equivalent to ANSI-ANAB accreditation. ANSI-American National Standards Institute, took over complete ownership in 2018 of ANAB These equivalencies include accreditation bodies operating under the former IAF (International Accreditation Forum incorporated in Delaware ) and ILAC (International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation- Guberman states that this merger, combined with the renaming of the aerospace standard AS9100 to AI9100 in the same month, raises structural concerns requiring immediate public and regulatory scrutiny. Aerospace Impact: Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Sikorsky, Airbus, and Others Guberman's analysis highlights that the aerospace sector - which relies heavily on AS9100 series certification - is uniquely exposed. He notes:
In certification terms, these 3,000 aircraft are effectively INVALID, as no regulatory mechanism exists to "repair" or legitimize production conducted under invalid or fraudulent quality system credentials. Guberman further notes that more than 12,000 commercial aircraft and over 400+ military aircraft built between 2002 and 2026 fall within the broader window where certification oversight may not have met AS9100 requirements. He emphasizes that FAA airworthiness certificates evaluate only final assembly and visible conformity - not the underlying materials, components, or supplier level quality systems that AS9100 is designed to control. The long standing belief that FAA airworthiness equates to AS9100 certification is a mistaken belief that has been repeated for decades within both the quality community and regulatory culture. The "GUBERMAN-ANOMOLY- Defense Sector Exposure Defense programs relying on AS9100 series certification - including F 35 production, rotary wing platforms, and classified systems - may also be affected. Guberman notes that suppliers delivered materials under certificates they believed were valid, while OEMs relied on accreditation structures now under scrutiny which are FRAUDULENT. Cross Industry Contamination The issue extends far beyond aerospace and defense. Industries relying on ANAB or MRA/MLA equivalent accreditation include:
Federal Contract 19AQMM18R0131 (2018) Guberman's briefing references a 2018 federal contract Department of State - 19AQMM18R0131 - in which ANAB acted as an underwriter. He asserts that contradictions in ANAB's accreditation status during this period create systemic exposure for federal procurement programs. International Oversight Concerns (2015-2021) Guberman highlights the period from 2015-2021, during which Xiao Jianhua chaired the IAF. Guberman notes:
"In 2018, under federal contract 19AQMM18R0131, the U.S. Department of State effectively invited an accreditation structure overseen by a Chinese national Xiao Jianhua- mandated under Article 7 to provide data to Beijing - into a federal procurement chain." He notes that U.S. defense and aerospace suppliers were required to accept certifications accredited under the IAF association during this period, creating additional oversight and national security concerns. Conformity Assessment Failure When accreditation is invalid:
"There is no legal or technical mechanism to legitimize production built on fraudulent accreditation." Summary of Findings Guberman concludes:
"This is not an aerospace problem - it is a global accreditation problem. From 2018 to the present, every industry that relied on ANAB or MRA/MLA equivalent accreditation may have unknowingly operated under fraudulent certification. The public deserves transparency, and regulators must address the systemic contradictions that allowed this to occur." ANAB is still being advertised as an underwriter for IAF-ILAC on African Fuse a technical magazine as here: https://www.crown.co.za/ ABOUT DARYL GUBERMAN Daryl Guberman is a 40 year quality expert, Boeing shareholder, systemic risk advisor, and forensic archivist with cross industry experience spanning aerospace, medical devices, food safety, cybersecurity, and manufacturing. As CEO of Guberman PMC LLC since 2011, he has led investigations and documentation efforts that have reshaped public understanding of accreditation integrity and supplier level oversight. Guberman has exposed what he identifies as the largest industrial fiduciary breakdown in modern U.S. manufacturing history - an exposure unmatched by any individual, organization, or entity. His work combines technical depth, archival precision, and a commitment to public accountability, establishing him as a singular voice in the national conversation on quality, safety, and systemic risk. Media Contact DARYL GUBERMAN ***@yahoo.com Photos: https://www.prlog.org/ https://www.prlog.org/ https://www.prlog.org/ End
|
Account Phone Number