Boeing Pushed FRAUDULENT "ANAB Accreditation: 2018 Through 2026"

EVERETT, Wash. - March 10, 2026 - PRLog -- Newly consolidated evidence reveals that Boeing's accreditation and supplier‑control structure—from April 2002 through 2026—was built on a system of coercion, financial funneling, and reliance on  ANSI-ANAB (American National Standards Institute- American National Accreditation Board)  ANAB accreditation that was never independently verified. This release connects the full chain: Boeing's 2002 supplier bulletins, ANAB's embedded presence on Boeing's portal, ANSI's Heads Up 22 mandate, FAA delegation failures, internal contradictions within ANAB's own leadership, the 2018 DOS Department Of State contract identifying ANAB as an underwriter, and the public statements made by Boeing's own Vice President of Quality.

GUBERMAN-ANOMOLY-DISCOVERY: https://guberman-quality.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/GUBERMAN-Anomaly-%E2%80%93-Discovery.pdf

This release is issued by Daryl Guberman — Truth‑Sayer, systemic‑risk advisor, and forensic archivist & Boeing Shareholder with 25‑year record documenting oversight failures across aerospace, accreditation, and certification.

BOEING Pushed Fraudulent ANAB Accreditation 2018-2026 https://youtu.be/5sMnD6_KOog



Boeing's 2002 Supplier Bulletins: The True Start of the Funnel

April 2002: Boeing Mandates NADCAP for Special Processes

In April 2002, Boeing issued a supplier bulletin requiring all special‑process suppliers to be NADCAP certified for:

• Heat treatment
• Welding
• Flight‑critical processes
• Non‑destructive testing (NDT)

This was not a quality initiative — it was the first stage of a coercive funnel.

Suppliers were told plainly:

"Get NADCAP or you do not do work for Boeing."
There was no alternative path.

July 2002: Boeing Adds AS9100 + ANAB Accreditation
Just months later, Boeing issued a second bulletin requiring:

• AS9100 certification,
• Issued by an ANAB‑accredited registrar, (2018 ANSI-took complete control over ANAB).
• Regardless of existing NADCAP status. NADCAP certified suppliers were required to get AS9100 accredited by ANAB and companies wanting to become a supplier were forced into AS9100 accredited by Boeing's supplier portal which required ANAB accreditation.

This was the monetization stage of the funnel.
Key facts:

• ANAB was placed directly on Boeing's supplier portal
• NADCAP‑certified suppliers were still forced into AS9100- ANAB accreditation
• Boeing pushed suppliers into a fee‑driven accreditation pipeline
• Boeing financially benefited from the funnel
• These April and July bulletins became the foundation of a 24‑year system of forced compliance.

October 2003: ANSI's Heads Up 22: The Lock‑In Mechanism

ANSI and ANAB issued Heads Up 22, which mandated that AS9100‑certified companies:

• Must be entered into the OASIS Online Aerospace Systems Information System database
• Must pay database fees
• Cannot refuse inclusion- Or suspension of AS9100 certification.

At the time, Boeing controlled approximately 65% of the IAQG-International Aerospace Quality Group, meaning the same company benefiting from the funnel also influenced the rule‑making body enforcing it.
This is a structural conflict of interest.
2009: FAA Delegation: Boeing Became the Agency
The FAA's delegation structure effectively made Boeing an agent of the FAA, allowing Boeing to:

• Approve its own work (self-certify its own aircraft, aircraft technologies (MCAS System that killed 346 people-Indonesian-Lion 610 & Ethiopian-302 Airline), & designs
• Oversee its own compliance
• Influence certification pathways
• Operate without independent oversight
• Boeing/FAA employees were paid by Boeing
• CEO of Boeing was a De-Facto FAA Administrator
• After crashes in 2018-2019 an FAA spokes person said "FAA never allows a company to police themselves or self-certify their own aircraft" This was a contradiction from 2009.

This created a closed loop where Boeing dictated the rules, enforced the rules, and benefited from the rules.

2012: Tim W. Lee's 2012 Memo: The Contradiction at the Core
In 2012, Tim W. Lee— IAQG Chairman, serving on ANAB's Management System Accreditation Committee (2014-2024)—issued a memo instructing accreditation bodies to:
"Maintain vigilance over unaccredited certifications."

Yet at that time:

• Boeing itself was not certified to AS9100
• Boeing was enforcing AS9100 requirements on suppliers
• Lee sat on a specification committee governing Boeing's supplier requirements D6-82479 REV K.
• His signature appears on documents that contradict Boeing's own status

This is a direct contradiction:

The enforcer was not CERTIFIED with the standard it enforced.
Federal Contract 19AQMM18R0131: ANAB Identified as an Underwriter — And Boeing Pushed It Anyway.

In 2018, federal contract 19AQMM18R0131 revealed that ANAB was designated as an underwriter — a role involving financial liability, operational risk, and oversight responsibilities that were never disclosed to suppliers, regulators, or the public.
Despite this revelation, Boeing continued—between 2018 and 2026—to push ANAB accreditation onto its global supplier base, even though:

• Boeing itself had not been certified to AS9100/IA9100  starting July 2002
• Boeing had aligned itself with ANAB since 2002
• Boeing sat on ANAB's Management System Accreditation Committee for a decade
• ANAB was now tied to a federal contract showing misrepresentation to the U.S. government

Not a Mistake: ANAB's "Underwriter" Status Repeated in Public Domain — And Boeing Weaponized It From 2018 to 2026

The same false claim appears outside the federal government, in:

• A private‑sector laboratory website
• A technical magazine still live today https://www.crown.co.za/latest-news/african-fusion-latest-news/7866-calibration-essential-for-accurate-safe-and-traceable-ndt  (Paragraph 4 & 5)

 IAF-International Accreditation Forum incorporated in Delaware/ILAC International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation-Australia merged in 2026 to form GLOBAC Global Accreditation Cooperation. AS 9100 aerospace standard in 2026 became IA9100. Apparently to hide ANAB's underwriter fraud on federal contract 19AQMM18R0131 (ANAB is an underwriter for IAF-ILAC)

Both state that ANAB is an underwriter for the IAF & ILAC.
These are not casual mistakes.
These are independent confirmations of the same misrepresentation found in the federal contract.
But the deeper issue is what happened after 2018.
From 2018 through 2026, Boeing sat on ANAB's Management System Accreditation Committee (MSAC) — the committee with the authority to:

• Grant certifications
• Suspend certifications
• Withdraw certifications

This means Boeing held direct influence over the very accreditation body it was forcing onto its suppliers.
From 2018 onward, Boeing pushed a fraudulent accreditation body onto the global supply chain — while sitting in the seat that controlled the system.
Suppliers — many of them long‑standing, high‑integrity companies — unknowingly bought into an accreditation system that was:

• Misrepresented at the federal level
• Misrepresented in the private sector
• Misrepresented in technical publications
• Influenced and shaped by Boeing itself

Suppliers had no knowledge that the accreditation system they were forced into was compromised.
The system was corrupted — not by the suppliers, but by Boeing and ANAB.
This means:

• AS9100 certificates issued under ANAB from 2018 onward were structurally compromised
• The accreditation system governing Boeing's suppliers was fraudulent
• The integrity of the parts produced under that system was theoretically jeopardized
• Aircraft built with those parts were placed at unnecessary risk

When the accreditation system is fraudulent, the aircraft built under that system are jeopardized.
Boeing's seat on the MSAC — combined with ANAB's false "underwriter" status — destroyed the integrity of the entire oversight structure from 2018 to 2026.
The suppliers did not fail.
The system failed them.
And Boeing engineered that system.

The Truth‑Sayer's Stand: DHS, Bloomberg, Politico
https://www.newstribune.com/photos/2024/apr/18/3749044/
On April 17, 2024, Truth‑Sayer Daryl Guberman stood before the DHS Subcommittee under threat or being ejected or arrested and presented the contradictions, the funnel, and the accreditation failures.

• Bloomberg and Politico approached him
• They acknowledged the evidence
• They stated they could not run the story because:

"Nobody's gonna go flying."
The media waits for fatalities, not warnings. If they did print this apparently, they would lose access to Boeing for news and information.
June 18, 2024: The Calhoun Meeting
Truth‑Sayer Daryl Guberman attended Boeing CEO David Calhoun's June 18, 2024 meeting, continuing his direct engagement with Boeing leadership and reinforcing the urgency of systemic reform. A woman in the audience was holding a picture of her daughter that was killed in one of the Indonesian-Lion 610 & Ethiopian-302 Airlines. She was screaming "You killed my daughter you killed my family"

This meeting occurred before Boeing's Vice President of Quality made her public claims.

Liar Liar Pants on Fire: Elizabeth Lund's June 27, 2024 Statement
On June 27, 2024, Elizabeth Lund — Vice President of Quality for The Boeing Company — stated in a Reuters interview that:

• Boeing was willing and prepared to obtain AS9100 certification
• Boeing was compliant with the AS9100 standard
• Boeing was conducting internal audits as if they were certified

Yet Boeing had not been certified to AS9100 since July 2002.
Her claims collapse under the weight of on‑the‑ground evidence.
October 2024: Truth‑Sayer Daryl Guberman Goes to Washington State
In October 2024, Truth‑Sayer Daryl Guberman visited Boeing facilities in:

•  Everett,  Renton, Auburn,Northfield

He spent nearly a month interviewing many employees.
Findings:

• Employees had no knowledge of AS9100
• Employees had never heard of internal auditing
• Employees had no AS9100 training
• Supervisors blocked safety training because "the plane has to move"
• Build histories contained missing paperwork
• Morale was low and concerns were high.

The shop‑floor reality contradicted Boeing leadership's public statements.

Boeing's Suppliers: Forced Into NADCAP and ANAB — Or Cut Off from Boeing Work Entirely

From 2002 forward, Boeing suppliers were not participating in a voluntary quality ecosystem — they were coerced into a mandatory accreditation regime.
NADCAP was not optional.
Boeing told suppliers in April 2002:
"Get NADCAP or you do not do work for Boeing."
AS9100/ANAB was not optional.
In July 2002, Boeing added:
"Get AS9100 certified by an ANAB‑accredited registrar — or you do not do work for Boeing."
This created a dual‑accreditation trap:

• NADCAP for special processes
• AS9100/ANAB for system certification

No NADCAP = no Boeing.
No AS9100/ANAB = no Boeing.
Suppliers complied because they had no choice.
Meanwhile:

• Boeing itself was not AS9100 certified 2002-Present
• Boeing sat on ANAB's Management System Accreditation Committee, that can grant, suspend, and withdraw accreditation.
• Boeing relied on certificates instead of oversight
• Boeing accepted parts without verifying the processes behind them

Suppliers were told:
"Send in your parts.
Send in your certifications.

If the need arises or need be, Boeing will come to your facility."
And then — when the door plug blew off Alaska Air 1282 — Boeing suddenly appeared at supplier sites, proving that the oversight system they claimed to have in place was never functioning.

Conclusion: The Illusion of Oversight Has Collapsed

From 2002 to 2026, Boeing pushed fraudulent accreditation through ANAB (2018 to present), enforced by supplier bulletins, federal delegation, and institutional silence.

The system was never independent.

The oversight was never real.

The public was never protected.

The record is now undeniable.

The archive stands.

The Truth‑Sayer has spoken.

How Boeing's 2002 Mandates, ANAB's Federal Underwriter Fraud, and the 2026 GLOBAC Merger Exposed a Collapse in Certification Across All Industries https://www.prlog.org/13131138-how-boeings-2002-mandates-anabs-federal-underwriter-fraud-and-the-2026-globac-merger-exposed-collapse-in-certification-across-all-industries.html#