EEOC Charge Against Ball Corporation Sparks Escalating Allegations and Internal Disruption at Pittston Facility

WILKES-BARRE, Pa. - Dec. 8, 2025 - PRLog -- Intro: Ball Corporation's Pittston, Pennsylvania facility has become the center of escalating allegations of discrimination and retaliation. Army veteran and senior leadership member Mr. Drost has filed a federal EEOC charge, and subsequent events inside the plant illustrate what insiders describe as a growing pattern of exclusion, threats, and controversial leadership decisions.

Timeline of Events

November 24, 2025

• Upon returning from PTO multiple meetings were removed from Mr. Drost's calendar and canceled. He was excluded from several meetings, a pattern which insiders note has continued.
• At approximately 3:30 p.m., during a plant meeting, the Plant Manager stated: "It is unfair of us to be sending emails to the team demanding team members have a certain program up on their screens at all times." Mr. Drost understood this comment to be directed at him, as he had previously instructed supervisors to keep the PI dashboard visible for audit purposes.

December 1, 2025

• Mr. Drost was excluded from the Environmental Health and Safety (EHS) Manager interview at 3:30 p.m., despite the critical nature of the position. This follows a pattern of being left out of interviews for multiple roles.
• During the weekly staff meeting, several team members refused to provide departmental updates to Mr. Drost.

December 2, 2025

• Ball Corporation issued a meeting invite for an ADA paperwork update. Mr. Drost responded after signing his EEOC charge.
• Following receipt of the formal EEOC charge notice, Ball Corporation abruptly shifted its approach and attempted to accept the doctor's letter. Up to this point, Ball had ceased sending emails — a tactic insiders describe as an effort to avoid leaving a paper trail — and instead relied solely on meeting invites.
• After Mr. Drost refused to participate in the ADA paperwork process (having already refused multiple times over nearly a month due to Ball's repeated bad‑faith efforts), and after informing Ball of the EEOC charge, he declined to provide the doctor's letter. Ball then reverted to threats against his employment. In two separate emails, Ball instructed Mr. Drost to "write your own plan and schedule your meetings or face termination," further noting that his progress was being "documented."

December 3, 2025 – Promotion of Taylor Ellison

• The day after DHI‑Wire published its initial article naming Plant Manager Taylor Ellison, an insider reported that Ball Corporation promoted him to a regional role. According to multiple sources inside the plant, employees believe this move was intended to shield Ellison from liability and remove him from the immediate situation.
• Even if Ellison formally applied and succeeded in the interview process, the timing has raised questions. Promoting a manager directly named in a public article so soon after the company was exposed to liability has been described by insiders as either a failure to recognize public perception or a deliberate choice to ignore optics.

December 3, 2025 – Reaction to Promotion

• Employees observed a noticeable change in Ellison's demeanor. According to multiple accounts, Ellison appeared visibly unsettled and fidgeting, in stark contrast to his earlier confidence following the promotion announcement. Insiders interpreted this shift as evidence of mounting pressure and growing awareness of the backlash among floor employees.

Leadership Allegations

Ball Corporation's leadership — including CEO Ron Lewis, CFO Daniel J. Rabbitt, and Senior Vice President & President of North and Central America Kathleen Pitre — are alleged to have permitted or enabled discrimination, harassment, and retaliation against Mr. Drost.

Other ket contributors at both the corporate and local level. Named individuals include Hannah Lim‑Johnson (Chief Legal Officer), Melissa Benson (Director, HR Operations – NCA), Larissa Morris (Regional HR Manager), Christopher Grimley (VP NCA), Gene Bosic (Global VP NCA), Colleen McNee (Pittston HR Manager), and Taylor Ellison (Plant Manager). According to the allegations, these managers acted in ways that insiders argue disregarded federal compliance standards, placing company policy above federal law. Observers have described the situation as a cautionary tale that could serve as future HR training material on how not to handle protected employee rights.

The Loyalist HR Manager – Colleen McNee

Human Resources managers are expected to remain neutral, serve as the company's first line of compliance defense, and uphold federal law. However, insiders allege that Pittston HR Manager Colleen McNee has failed to maintain neutrality. Reports suggest she has adopted an "I have your back" approach toward fellow office staff, reinforcing a clique that has contributed to a hostile work environment.

Multiple email tips and employee accounts describe a pattern in which individuals deemed a "non‑fit" by the Plant Manager, HR Manager, or Training Supervisor are targeted for constructive discharge. According to current and former employees, this process relies on an internal behavioral model used as a trigger to push employees out, raising concerns about fairness and compliance.

Reduced Calendar and Reduced Input

Following Mr. Drost's notices to Ball Corporation, there has been a clear reduction in his scope of work and access to plant activities. He has been left out of nearly all internal discussions of plant events, meetings, and decisions. Instead, other plant leadership have emailed plans and requests for work to him. Despite remaining Assistant Plant Manager — a role that traditionally requires deep operational involvement — Mr. Drost has been sidelined. This isn't just an allegation; according to documentation provided by Mr. Drost, he has backed it with evidence.

Strategic Executive Silence

Observers have questioned why newly placed CEO Ron Lewis and CFO Daniel Rabbitt have remained silent despite direct warnings from Mr. Drost. Both executives are responsible for Ball Corporation's stock performance and governance obligations, yet they have neither intervened at the plant level nor acknowledged Mr. Drost's communications. Mr. Drost has interpreted this silence as retaliatory.

Promises Kept

After Ball Corporation continued to refuse accommodations and issue threats of termination during protected activity, Mr. Drost followed through on his promise to escalate. DHI‑Wire is in possession of direct communications sent to CEOs of major shareholders and customers, including Vanguard, BlackRock, State Street, T. Rowe Price, Coca‑Cola, Anheuser‑Busch, Red Bull, and Yuengling. Both Ron Lewis and Daniel Rabbitt were included on these disclosures, which insiders note would normally trigger immediate board‑level crisis management. Yet, according to reports, no resolution has been attempted.

December 9, 2025 Deadline

Ball Corporation has given Mr. Drost until December 9, 2025 at 5:00 p.m. to complete what insiders describe as an unlawful medical packet and to submit a self‑incriminating "improvement plan." Failure to comply, according to Ball's communications, would subject him to company policy that could result in termination — despite the fact that there is active federal oversight of the situation.

DHI‑Wire will continue to monitor developments with Mr. Drost and maintain contact with employees who have been communicating with us.

A Lawyer or an Intimidator?

Ball Corporation's Chief Legal Officer, Hannah Lim‑Johnson, has been directly informed of these issues since November 10, 2025. Yet, insiders allege that HR responses since then contained retaliatory and discriminatory language, which they argue disregards federal law and elevated company policy above compliance.

Ball HR or Ball Mafia?

Documents reviewed by DHI‑Wire suggest Ball Corporation's HR and Legal responses can be described as resembling intimidation tactics rather than professional compliance. Examples include directives such as: "Any input you have should be added to your action plan," "We will continue the interactive process once we have the required paperwork," and "Failure to do so may result in termination."

Insiders describe these communications — more than 50 pieces of evidence — as cold, calculated, and dismissive of service‑related issues. They argue the language reflects disregard for the sacrifice and discipline of veterans, raising broader questions about Ball Corporation's culture.

Ball Corporation's Veteran‑Friendly Claims

Ball Corporation publicly positions itself as veteran‑friendly. Yet insiders argue that the treatment of Mr. Drost undermines this claim. Allowing a local HR manager to release self‑incriminating communications and documents — with apparent legal approval — raises questions about whether the company can sustain its veteran‑friendly posture.

Closing Summary

The unfolding events at Ball Corporation's Pittston facility highlight a widening gap between corporate claims and employee experiences. Mr. Drost's EEOC charge, coupled with documented exclusions, threats, and insider reports, paints a picture of systemic governance failure.

The promotion of Taylor Ellison, despite being named in public allegations, has intensified scrutiny. Meanwhile, communications reviewed by DHI‑Wire suggest HR and Legal responses that insiders describe as hostile and dismissive of federal law.

DHI‑Wire has also received dozens of emails from current and former Ball Corporation employees, further corroborating claims of a hostile environment and deepening questions about the company's governance and compliance posture.

With Ball Corporation now giving Mr. Drost until December 9, 2025 at 5:00 p.m. to complete what insiders describe as an unlawful medical packet or face termination — despite active federal oversight — the stakes have escalated sharply.

Media and whistleblowers should contact Benjamin.h@dhiwire.com

Photos:
https://www.prlog.org/13115444/1
https://www.prlog.org/13115444/2
https://www.prlog.org/13115444/3