Starship Debacle Proves Marshall Barnes' Superior Strategy for Humanity

BROWNSVILLE, Texas - April 22, 2023 - PRLog -- "Just imagine if that thing had been fully loaded with 100 passengers and crew. It would've have added a whole new meaning to the phrase, Oh, the humanity!'..."

So said R&D engineer scientist, Marshall Barnes, as he read reports of the aerospace disaster after SpaceX and Elon Musk had started their own spin on the story as being an expected test failure, though Marshall understands the issues with aerospace endeavors and the nature of technical failures that can occur.

He begins, "They know what went wrong. Why not anticipate that? My point is it has to be about reliability and not luck. Because you can get to a point when things could go wrong but don't just due to luck and not because everything is set, solid and consistent. Now if at this point they have some low level of expectation for whatever reason, that's one thing, but not good."

Marshall sees the failure as part of Elon's pattern of errors. First there's the idea going interstellar with humanity is a good idea when pursuing the solution to going to the past, although difficult, is by far less expensive and more productive both in terms of humanitarian goals and financial possibilities than space travel and he has had the opportunity to get involved but has ignored it despite the popularity of the idea among his fan base. That the idea of Neuralink is a practical answer to the challenge of the superiority of AI when all it does is make every user susceptible to lethal electromagnetic targeting as well as radiation damage from the Bluetooth technology it uses. That his AI company, TruthGPT is going to make a difference when it's the inherent nature of AI that's the problem and can't be perceived as such by any AI proponents because most if not all of them suffers from a psychological disorder Marshall has identified as "digitalcentrism" which prevents them from seeing solutions to problems without a computer tech basis. So AI is not a problem or a threat to Humanity but an inevitability to adapt to despite the fact we're the ones responsible for its creation.

"We've been following people seen as being far smarter when in fact they're defective, damaged, delusional, and they're going to cause the end of the world and the biggest evidence is when Elon Musk and Sam Altman and the rest, called for a pause on advanced AI development - because they didn't really know what they were doing and never did.

https://youtu.be/13KtGfpZtDw