News By Tag
News By Location
Legal Impact - Natl Urban League Report on Blacks and COVID [2-5PM]
Could Trigger Law Suits Over Illegal Disparate Treatment of African Americans
In addition to some causes which are beyond the control of the hospitals to which COVID-19 patients are admitted, there is overwhelming evidence that Blacks receive both less and inferior health care, and this could lead to race discrimination law suits, says Banzhaf.
The reason this is important is that laws in the District of Columbia, and apparently other states as well, permit legal actions for race discrimination based upon disparate outcomes, even if the precise cause or mechanism cannot be established.
In other words, if the death and/or disability rates for people who are admitted to hospitals for COVID-19 - and have the same pre-existing conditions (such as high blood pressure, diabetes, etc.) and vital signs - are substantially higher for Blacks than for other patients, the hospital's treatment decisions and other actions have (in the statutory language) the "effect or consequence"
Given the large number of COVID-19 patients admitted to hospitals, and records indicating their pre-existing conditions, vital signs, and factors such as age, gender, and race, it should be possible to see if White patients, on the average, fared better than similarly situated Black patients, argues Banzhaf, whose expertise in statistics includes the invention of the well known Banzhaf Index.
This could help move the current outrage over racial disparities from the streets and learned journal to courts and regulatory agencies which are in a position to take effective action, and provide legal leverage for disadvantaged people.
Banzhaf cites his own legal action which slashed smoking rates in the U.S. (thereby saving millions of lives and hundreds of billions of dollars), and the law suit he and his law students put together which forced McDonald's to pay over $12 million in a settlement and to cease deceptive advertising for its french fries.
Banzhaf, who pioneered the use of legal actions to attack major public health problems, and has been remarkably successful in such suits, has been called: "The Man Behind the Ban on Cigarette Commercials,"