News By Tag
News By Place
Criminal Defense Attorney publishes article on changes in self defense law in Florida
Criminal defense lawyer Patrick Michael Megaro comments on Martin v. State, an appellate decision from the Second District Court of Appeal of Florida
By: Halscott Megaro PA
Florida legislature's amendment to section 776.032 marks an important shift in self defense laws in the state of Florida. As the Martin court explained "[t]he Florida Legislature's amendment to section 776.032 added the following provision: (4) In a criminal prosecution, once a prima facie claim of self defense immunity from criminal prosecution has been raised by the defendant at a pretrial immunity hearing, the burden of proof by clear and convincing evidence is on the party seeking to overcome the immunity from criminal prosecution provided in subsection (1)." The Martin court went on to explain that "as it now stands, the State bears the burden of disproving, by clear and convincing evidence, a facially sufficient claim of self-defense immunity in a criminal prosecution."
This is obviously a very important change in criminal cases involving self defense claims. Before the amendment, criminal defendants in Florida who wished to assert self defense had the burden of proof. It was the defendant that had to convince the jury that their actions were justified due to self defense. After the amendment, the defendant only has to present a facially sufficient claim of self defense, a very low bar. The burden of proof now rests on the prosecution to show that there was no justification for self defense, and the burden is by clear and convincing evidence, one step below beyond reasonable doubt, but still a very significant hurdle.
Martin case went on to address whether the amendment applies only to cases going forward or retroactively to all existing criminal cases. "Statutory amendments may take one of three forms: substantive, which are usually applied prospectively, or procedural or remedial, either of which may apply retroactively to pending proceedings"
The Martin court noted that "n Florida, statutory changes to the burden of proof—the change at issue here—are invariably deemed procedural in nature for purposes of retroactive application."
The article will be published in full on the Blog of Mr. Megaro, https://patrickmegaroblog.blogspot.com/
About Patrick Megaro
Patrick Michael Megaro is an attorney at Halscott Megaro PA. His primary areas of practice are criminal defense, criminal appeals, post-conviction relief, civil appeals, and civil rights litigation.
The Megaro Criminal Law Library: https://themegarocriminallawlibrary.com/
Halscott Megaro PA
Patrick Megaro Esq.