News By Tag
News By Location
In Time For His Birthday, The Parallel Universes of Hugh Everett Now Proven Fact
From a series of experiments begun last year, and now approaching 20, internationally noted R&D engineer Marshall Barnes now has enough overwhelming evidence to declare Hugh Everett's many world's interpretation of quantum mechanics a fact.
By: Fame Plan
Marshall has identified what he calls the "Five Factors" that are present in his experiments which support his contentions concerning parallel universes. He will release them in a paper on Everett's birthday, Saturday. In brief, the Five Factors are:
2. Prediction: Marshall not only predicted that these experiments would be possible in his 2013 special report to select members of the U.S. Congress, "Paradox Lost", the results of the experiments match the type of results predicted in 1995 and then published in 1997 in the journal, Foundations of Physics by German astrophysicist Rainer Plaga.
Conclusion: If these experiments aren't proof of parellel universes, then why do they match so many of those things related to that science, fulfill related predictions and finally, how else can laser hits appear from nowhere without CAUSE? The Five Factors provide overwhelming evidence to this work as a major breakthough, demanding consideration because of what it accomplishes - a validation and extension of the theories and predictions of not only Hugh Everett, but Rainer Plaga, and John Archibald Wheeler. Furthermore, it destroys the position of John G. Cramer that "the decades-long endeavor to explicate and fulfill Hugh Everett III's "Relative State Interpretation..is nevertheless ill-fated".
Ironically enough, last year, Cramer's own attempt at a retrocausality experiment, using quantum entanglement, finally failed, after a series of false starts over a number of years, something that Marshall believes could have something to do with Cramer's approach to the nature of time.
"I keep getting asked about this, so I am going to review it," Marshall replies, "but I know that he has made comments about affecting the past which my experiments prove are wrong and that also means his own interpretation of quantum mechanics - the transactional interpretation, is wrong. I think that the time is fast coming when this idea of things moving forward and backward in time is going to be dumped completely, in favor of a new model of time, which my experiments are in part, an exhibit of. I'm going to deal with that and more, in my new paper on the Five Factors".
His new paper follows his initial special report, already released, Changing Worlds Like TV Channels (see http://www.academia.edu/