News By Tag Industry News News By Place Country(s) Industry News
Follow on Google News | ![]() Appellate Court Decision: Seatback Defect Case a Victory for BISNAR|CHASE Product Liability LawyersAn appellate court upheld (Case Number: B239761) a $24.7 million jury verdict awarded to Jaklin Mikhal Romine who was rendered a permanent quadriplegic when the defective driver's seat of her car collapsed during a rear-end collision in October 2006.
Court documents state that Romine suffered catastrophic head and spinal cord injuries in spite of wearing a seatbelt because her seatback collapsed. On impact, Romine's seat broke and collapsed backwards allowing her body to submarine rearward underneath her seatbelt and shoulder restraint. Her head struck the back of the rear passenger seat causing her to suffer the severe injuries that left her permanently paralyzed, according to court filings. The appellate court issued a decision stating that the seat that caused Romine's permanent injuries was in fact defective. The appellate court also upheld the jury's $24.7 million verdict for Romine. "We are extremely pleased that the court upheld the jury's verdict for our client," said Brian Chase, lead trial attorney and partner at BISNAR | CHASE. "Jaklin has undergone permanent injuries as a result of a defective seatback. Her life will never be the same again." Chase said that since the early to mid-90s, Johnson Controls was well aware of the dangers and risks of weak seats. Because of this knowledge, the company had actually developed a design that was more structurally sound to prevent seats from collapsing in accidents such as this one. “As a matter of fact, had Johnson Controls used their other seat design, a seat design that is much more structurally sound that it had known about for at least 10 years before this accident, Jaklin would be walking today and suffered little or no injuries in this accident” says Chase. "They had the know-how to build safer seats, but chose to put profits before the safety of consumers," Chase said. "This tragedy could have been entirely avoided." The appellate court's decision, which upholds the jury award and deems the seatback in question to have been defective, is a tremendous victory not only for the product liability lawyers at BISNAR | CHASE who poured their time, efforts and passion into this case, but also for consumers, Chase said. "The appellate court also upheld the 'consumer expectation test,' which means that consumers have a reasonable expectation of safety from a product," Chase said. "Auto makers and manufacturers of other products do not want to be held up to that test. They'd rather have a battle of experts and confuse the jury. But, thankfully, the court held up the consumer expectation test, which is a win for us and the consumers." About BISNAR | CHASE The California auto product liability lawyers of BISNAR | CHASE represent people who have been seriously or catastrophically injured or those who have lost a family member due to a defective product, an accident or negligence. BISNAR | CHASE has won a wide variety of auto defect cases against most of the major auto manufacturers. Brian Chase, the firm's lead trial attorney, is the author of the most up-to-date and comprehensive auto defect book available today, "Still Unsafe at Any Speed: Auto Defects that Cause Wrongful Deaths and Catastrophic Injuries." For more information, please call 800-561-4887 or visit http://www.bestattorney.com/ End
|
|