Low Recovery Rates for Investors in Bankrupt Companies

S&P report shows that the recovery rates for investors has fallen in recent years. Investors are getting back smaller percentages of their investments in companies that have gone bankrupt.
Spread the Word
Listed Under

* Bankruptcy
* Investment
* Recovery

* Banking
* Investment

* West Chester - Pennsylvania - US

Sept. 19, 2012 - PRLog -- This week, Standard and Poor’s released the findings of an extensive study on “defaulted instruments” in a report entitled “Piecing Together The Performance Of Defaulted Instruments After The Recent Credit Cycle.” As is perhaps evident from its title, the report is quite lengthy and is clearly intended for an audience familiar with a series of financial terms and other jargon. The full report can be accessed from Standard and Poor’s.

In a nutshell, the conclusion S&P draws in its report is that while recovery rates for those invested in companies that go bankrupt vary widely depending on several factors, they have fallen significantly in recent years, across the board. To understand this better, it is helpful to start at the beginning, and consider the company in the years before its bankruptcy. Most companies in the market, especially large ones, operate with a fair amount of debt. They may have lines of credit, short or long term loans, and they may have sold bonds to investors with a promise to pay them back later or over a period of time. These bonds, in particular, can be attractive to investors because they are “fixed income,” and have a scheduled payout (as opposed to buying a company’s stock). It is normal, and even encouraged for a company to operate with some or all of these forms of debt, until that is, these debts become too large (or revenue becomes too small) for the company to sustain, at which point it may file for bankruptcy.

The question then becomes, what happens to those the company owes money to after it goes bankrupt? The answer is that their loans, bonds, etc become “defaulted instruments.” They are paid back in a given order, but they often do not receive the entire value of their investment. The amount of their original investment that they get back from their defaulted instrument is known as the recovery rate. They might for example, get paid half of what they were owed, for a recovery rate of 50%. What S&P is saying is that, on average, the percentage investors get back (the recovery rate) for their defaulted instruments has fallen in recent years.


Of course, the exact recovery rate for any investor depends primarily on the type of debt, with certain types of debt receiving priority over others during the bankruptcy process. Lines of credit, for example, are generally repaid before bonds, and thus have a significantly higher average recovery rate. Certain “senior bonds” also receive priority over others during the repayment process. However, one thing that all defaulted instruments have in common is this: the faster a company recovers, regains profitability, and emerges from bankruptcy, the higher their recovery rate will be. This, of course, makes sense given that companies earning more revenue are naturally more equipped to repay their debts. It also helps to explain why recovery rates have fallen in recent years.

The first factor S&P cites in explaining the recent fall in recovery rates is the recession, a so-called “macroeconomic” factor. This recession in particular has harmed recovery rates in that the nation has been unusually slow to rebound and return to solid economic growth. Naturally, this makes it much more difficult for bankrupt companies to emerge and return to profitability. As a result, they are less able to repay their debts, and recovery rates fall. This also leads to the second factor cited in the S&P reports: companies’ increasing use of “distressed exchanges.” Distressed exchanges are usually used in the case of bonds, and are essentially a way for companies to “roll-over” their debt, offering investors new bonds in exchange for the ones they have. This is perhaps best explained with an example.

Let us consider a company called ABC Inc.They are bankrupt, and thanks to the recession, it doesn’t look like they’ll be returning to profitability any time soon. Basically, their bondholders know there is very little chance that they will be able to repay anything close to the original value of their bond; they are expecting VERY low recovery rates. As a result, ABC Inc.’s bonds aren’t worth much: a $100 bond can only be sold for $10 on the market. In a distressed exchange, ABC Inc. would allow their investors to trade in their bonds for $20 (or some other number above market value) in exchange for new ones. These new bonds would have a later maturity date, allowing ABC Inc. more time to (hopefully) work their way out of bankruptcy and pay them back. Many investors, especially recently, have settled for this type of deal with the expectation that it is probably the best that they can expect to get. As a result, the number of distressed exchanges has skyrocketed in recent years, and recovery rates have fallen. For the most part, this is simply another fall-out from the recession, but it does help to explain the recent fall in recovery rates, especially for bonds.

Visit http://www.luongobellwoarlaw.com/ for more information.
Source:Luongo Bellwoar LLP
Tags:Bankruptcy, Investment, Recovery
Industry:Banking, Investment
Location:West Chester - Pennsylvania - United States
Account Email Address Verified     Account Phone Number Verified     Disclaimer     Report Abuse
Page Updated Last on: Oct 17, 2012

Like PRLog?
Click to Share