CLEAN Contracts a Cheaper Solar Policy than Solar REC Markets

With lower risk and increased transparency, CLEAN Contracts make solar power cheaper than other solar policies like solar REC markets, says a new report from the Institute for Local Self-Reliance.
Spread the Word
Listed Under

Solar Pv
Clean Contracts
Renewable Energy
Distributed Generation
Distributed Solar


Minneapolis - Minnesota - US

Oct. 17, 2011 - PRLog -- The low risk and transparency of CLEAN Contract Programs can provide states with more solar at a lower cost than solar renewable energy certificate (SREC) programs, says a new report released last week.  Produced by the Institute for Local Self-Reliance (ILSR), CLEAN v. SREC: Finding the More Cost-Effective Solar Policy finds that an otherwise identical solar project installed for $4.00 per Watt in the nation’s second-largest solar market, New Jersey, costs ratepayers 20 percent more when financed by SRECs rather than CLEAN Contracts.  

The report also models the potential impact of New York’s proposed solar Solar Industry Development & Jobs Act of 2011 and finds that “the CLEAN Contract Program provides 40 percent greater ratepayer savings than an SREC program while providing 13 percent more solar power.”

CLEAN Contracts finance solar power development by requiring utilities to offer long-term (e.g. 20-year) contracts on a first-come, first-served basis at per-kilowatt-hour prices sufficient to attract solar development.  The policy (under various names) has provided financing for nearly 90 percent of the world’s solar power.  In contrast, SRECs represent the environmental value of a megawatt-hour of solar electricity.  Their price is high when there is a shortage of solar and low when there is a surplus of solar relative to the state’s mandated quantity.  This “market-based” mechanism served eight U.S. states fairly well until recent oversupply crashed nearly every state SREC market simultaneously.

“Many states were attracted to SRECs kvhf by the deceptive allure of the market,” said John Farrell, ILSR senior researcher and report author, “but this report highlights the irony: the volatility and cost of SRECs make this ‘market-based’ policy an inferior choice to CLEAN Contracts for states hoping to establish a robust and resilient solar market.”

The report details the major differences in the two solar policies, focusing on the risk factors for developers.  In all categories – including policy transparency, longevity and certainty – CLEAN Contracts make the process of developing solar projects less complicated and less risky.  CLEAN Contracts also more accurately price solar power than SRECs, because the former provides a modest return on investment based on the actual cost of installing solar power projects while the latter represent the surplus or shortfall of solar relative to a state-mandated demand for solar (and can fluctuate wildly).

The result is that CLEAN Contracts deliver more solar power at a lower cost.  

CLEAN v. SREC: Finding the More Cost-Effective Solar Policy can be downloaded on ILSR’s Energy Self-Reliant States website at

# # #

Providing innovative strategies, working models and timely information to support environmentally sound and equitable community development.
Source:Institute for Local Self-Reliance
Email:*** Email Verified
Tags:Solar, Solar Pv, Policy, State, Cost, Clean Contracts, Renewable Energy, Distributed Generation, Distributed Solar, Srec
Industry:Energy, Environment
Location:Minneapolis - Minnesota - United States
Account Email Address Verified     Account Phone Number Verified     Disclaimer     Report Abuse
New Rules @ Institute for Local Self-Reliance PRs
Trending News
Top Daily News
Top Weekly News

Like PRLog?
Click to Share