California Attorneys Subjected to Extortion by ‘Corrupt Courts’ – a Legal Ethics QuestionCounsel for Respondent stated that he would “tread lightly” in the matter, since he was intimidated by the treatment accorded to former US prosecutor Richard Fine, who was imprisoned in solitary confinement for 18 months.
By: Human Rights Alert, NGO Los Angeles, November 6 – Human Rights Alert and Joseph Zernik, PhD, forwarded to legal experts a California Legal Ethics questions, pertaining to duties and responsibilities of California attorneys facing extortion by ‘corrupt courts’. The matter arose from litigation of Hanassab v Hanassab (BD478923) – Petition for marriage dissolution at the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, where Receiver was appointed under conditions deemed as extortion by the Court, and Counsel for Respondent, although fully informed of the extortionist nature of the Receiver, stated that he would “tread lightly” in the matter, since he was intimidated by the treatment accorded to former US prosecutor Richard Fine, who stood up to corruption of the Los Angeles Court, and was imprisoned in solitary confinement for 18 months, with no warrant and no judgment/conviction or sentencing ever entered in his case. A recent United Nations Human Rights Council report referred to “corruption of the courts and the legal profession” in California. [a] However, regardless of voluminous evidence of operation of an enterprise by the LA-JR (alleged Los Angeles Judiciary Racket), the US Justice Department refuses to take action. The two common features of the LA-JR noted in previous complaints to the US Department of Justice included large-scale false imprisonments and financial fraud, including, but not limited to the installment of pretense receiverships, involving Attorney David Pasternak (former President of the Los Angeles County Bar Association, former Member of the California Judicial Council, and former President of Bet Tzedek), and others, falsely acting as Receivers with no valid and effectual Appointment Order ever entered. Regarding David Pasternak’s conduct, fraud expert – an FBI veteran, who was decorated by US Congress, by US Attorney General, and by FBI Director - opined “fraud being committed” (linked below). Numerous judges and commissioners were named as involved in the alleged racketeering, including, but not limited to JACQUELINE CONNOR, ALAN GOODMAN, GREGORY O’BREIN, JOHN SEGAL, TERRY FRIEDMAN, PATRICIA COLLINS, LISA HART-COLE, GERALD ROSENBERG, JAMES D ENDMAN, CHARLES MCCOY, J STEPHEN CZULEGER, AND DAVID YAFFE, (see links to complaints filed with the US Attorney Office below). Clerk of the Court JOHN A CLARKE is opined as central figure in the LA-JR. [2] In a previous communication with a California Attorney, who was apparently involved in pretense litigations at the court, the explanation offered by the Attorney for his conduct was in the need to provide for his wife and children. [c] However, in Hanassab v Hanassab (BD478923), Attorney Christopher G. Weston explicitly stated that his decision to “tread lightly on this issue” was guided by “considering what happened to Richard Fine” (copied below). The names of the judges involved, as well as David Pasternak’s name were concealed from the “Case Summary” of Hanassab v Hanassab - published by the Court online and deemed as false and deliberately misleading records, [d] while the Court denies access to the Registers of Actions – the California civil dockets. However, based on the departments listed, the Judges involved included AMY M PELLMAN (CE65) Request was forwarded to Attorney Weston for copies of key records in the case, for filing a complaint with US Department of Justice regarding racketeering by Attorney David Pasternak and judges of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles involved in the case. Human Rights Alert (NGO) is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles, California, and beyond. Special emphasis is given to the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of integrity of the justice system. LINKS: [a] 10-04-19 Human Rights Alert (NG0) submission to the United Nations Human Rights Council for the 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States as incorporated into the UPR staff report: http://www.scribd.com/ [2] 10-10-15 Proposed Organizational Chart of the LA-JR (alleged Los Angeles Judiciary Racket) s http://www.scribd.com/ [c] 10-11-03 California Legal Ethics Question: What Are the Duties and Responsibilities of an Attorney When Appearing in Pretense Court Proceedings Before a Corrupt Judge? http://www.scribd.com/ [d] 10-11-06 Hanassab v Hanassab (BD478923) – online Case Summary http://www.scribd.com/ # # # Human Rights Alert, a Los Angeles County, California, NGO, is committed to monitoring Human Rights violations by the US government, and reporting such violations, including, but not limited to the 2010 Universal Periodic Review of the US by the UN. End
|
|
