Warren Buffett a Saint, Goldman Sachs the Sinners?

How does it all fit together – St. Warren of Buffett, the “regular guy”, homespun, Midwestern guy, investing in Goldman Sachs, prime user of derivatives, and the most reviled and hated of the many Wall Street firms?
 
May 5, 2010 - PRLog -- While well-known to Americans and those who trade in US equities, many non-American readers of this site may not know who Warren Buffett is, so I hope the first group will forgive a SHORT introduction to the man and his importance.

Buffett is currently listed as the third richest man in the world, and CEO / main shareholder of Berkshire Hathaway,

a conglomerate holding company whose individual shares are worth approximately USD 100,000, largely because the company has never paid a dividend nor split its shares.

He is also considered one of the leading, because most successful, proponents of “value investing,” which he originally defined as “buying stocks at less than their intrinsic value” – at first delineated as “the discounted value of all future distributions.”

Over the last 25 years, however, he has taken the concept even further, to define it as "finding an outstanding company at a sensible price" rather than generic companies at a bargain price.

But, aside from the worship Americans give wealth in general, Buffett is beloved for basically four reasons, and, in the current context, one notable comment in particular.

The first is that, despite his huge fortune, he has not moved to any of the places usually associated with big money – eg, New York, Los Angeles, Miami, Las Vegas etc –

but has remained in his hometown of Omaha, Nebraska, where the winters are freezing and snowy, and the summers revoltingly humid.

The second, consequently, is that he has seemed to retain the personal characteristics of the alleged “homespun” Midwesterner: unpretentious, straight-talking, not a snob, and very accessible to people from all walks of life.

Not that most Midwesterners are actually like that – that’s just the stereotype, and Buffett’s public personality conforms to it perfectly. Whether it’s an “act” or not, no one can say.

Given this, the third reason Americans love him is that, despite all his money, he has continually expressed profound mistrust of – if not contempt for – Wall Street and everything that goes on there.

Fourth, he is an extremely generous philanthropist, whose politics are generally liberal – in the US framework – leading him to be a major donor to all sorts of “do-gooder” groups and activities,

as well as, for example, an early supporter of Barack Obama, which gave the latter a significant blast of credibility in the early stages of the endless American campaign season.

And finally, Buffett has been seen most recently as a fount of common-sense economic wisdom for regularly calling derivatives “financial weapons of mass destruction.”

As a result of all these, Buffett is regularly referred to as “The Oracle of Omaha”, or, as we like to call him “St Warren of Buffett”.

Now, why do we go through all this ???

The reason is that, ever since the announcement of the SEC civil indictment of Goldman Sachs –

generally considered the MOST evil of the many dubious denizens of Wall Street –

Buffett, and the vice-chair of Berkshire, Charlie Munger, have been among the most vocal and forthright defenders of the investment company.

Now given everything that we have said about why Buffett is such a beloved figure, his defense of GS raises a lot of questions, most notably:

If Buffett is so anti-Wall Street in general, then why is he so fond of the company that even people on Wall Street consider – perhaps with envy –

to be the sharpest operator in an environment generally considered “shark-like” at best ???

Even more disturbing:

If Buffett is such a militant foe of derivatives, then how on earth can he be so pro-Goldman when they –

along with the now-defunct Lehman Brothers, as we know from the whole Repo 105 scandal –

have been among the most consistent and earliest users of what he has so famously been quoted as calling “financial weapons of mass destruction” ???

Now part of it is that Buffett is simply defending his massive personal stake in GS:

He got a huge sweetheart deal from them at the height of the panic during Black September 2008, when he gave them five billion dollars,

in return for which he got preferred shares that pay an annual dividend of USD 500 million –

which means he will get his entire investment back in 10 years, whatever happens,

AND he got 43,478,260 – that’s right, 43 MILLION – warrants for common stock at a strike price of $115,

which means he also has a very definite stake in Goldman’s share price maintaining / increasing its value.

So how does all this fit together –

St. Warren of Buffett, the “regular guy”, homespun, Midwestern billionaire exponent of “value investing”, on the one hand,

and, on the other, Goldman Sachs, prime user of derivatives, and the most reviled and hated of the many Wall Street firms,

whose high-level employees have been raking in hundreds of thousands, if not millions, in compensation,

while most of the rest of the world sits mired in The Great Recession ???

Well, not to pat ourselves on the back too much, but we raised this question three months ago, well before the SEC suit –

long before anybody else was even thinking along these lines –

wondering how these two seemingly opposite poles of the US / global financial system could fit together so seamlessly.

The answer we came up with at that time, not surprisingly, was basically a question,

taken directly from the immortal words of Senator Howard Baker, when he asked about Richard Nixon’s involvement with Watergate –

then a scandal that, by today’s standards, would barely raise eyebrows –

namely, “what did he know, and when did he know it ???”

And with the announcement of the SEC fraud suit –

whose legal strength we originally questioned, but which has been strongly endorsed by some informed financial world bloggers –

we MAY have begun to get some answers about how much due diligence St Warren did before jumping into bed with what Matt Taibi has so famously called a “vampire squid”.

And it seems like the answer is, “quite a lot.”

To read the rest of this story at http://www.economywatch.com/, go to:

http://www.economywatch.com/economy-business-and-finance-...

# # #

EconomyWatch.com is the world's largest global, independent, economics community. Every month we serve over 750k users, who read and discuss economics, investing and finance topics.
End
EconomyWatch.com News
Trending
Most Viewed
Daily News



Like PRLog?
9K2K1K
Click to Share