Can social media predict the result of the General Election, asks CrowdControlHQ

By: PR Artistry
 
May 5, 2015 - PRLog -- James Leavesley, CEO of CrowdControlHQ discusses the question of the moment.

It’s a brave political party that ignores social media in the run up to the General Election. However, can social media activity predict how the nation will vote on Thursday 7 May and the final result?  Considering that more than 70% of adults (1) are now registered users of social media accounts, a reasonably accurate prediction should be viable as social media provides a platform for expression. However, another factor is that only certain ages or groups may feel comfortable expressing their opinions and political beliefs on a social platform.  The demographics of the electorate will be a major influence on the result and according to Ipsos Mori 76% of over-65s turned out to vote in the 2010 General Election compared with only 44% of 18 to 24-year-olds. With a smaller overall percentage of 65s active on social media, but more likely to vote than other age groups, any prediction is not easy.

The Obama Factor

The main contenders might be tempted to follow President Obama’s lead during the 2012 re-election campaign which saw his campaign office spend $47m on social media in comparison with Republican Mitt Romney his opponent’s spend of the $4.7m.  With the Conservative Party currently spending over £100,000 a month on its Facebook output, maybe it’s time to consider whether the choice of social media platform makes a difference.

If Facebook Likes were parliamentary seats then Facebook users predict a UKIP and Conservative coalition (2).  Yet on Twitter, with a younger demographic, the Labour party has more followers.  Are cash-strapped students more likely to vote for the party that promises to cut university tuition fees?  There are twice as many Twitter users aged 18-29 than 30-39 (3) is this why different demographics and social media channels appear to be supporting different parties?

Online Representations

It remains difficult to identify whether opinions expressed on social media are a genuine representation of an individual’s thoughts.  Maybe they are posting similar views seen online to conform.  Studies have found that many users have faked part of their online profiles to conform to social expectations.  The anonymity of voting is appreciated by online users – while agreeing online they may then vote for a different party.  The main factors that people lie about on social media are their location, occupation and relationship status, how can we be sure their opinions on political debates are honest?

Constructing an identity that is fictitious is effortless through social media sites.  The user is responsible for what they wish to share with their online friends, which means any personal image can be created.  A US survey (4) revealed that more than 30% of social media users are more honest in-person rather than online.  This suggests that opinions put across on social media accounts may not be representative of what a person truly thinks making it difficult to take what is said on social media at face value.  It’s a conundrum and difficult to predict a reliable result.

Social or Traditional Marketing

In marginal seats there is no doubt that traditional marketing methods will be heavily used by prospective candidates including leafleting,  appearances on local television and radio, shaking hands, being photographed with babies and even door-step canvassing.  However, political parties are not allowed to advertise on television, therefore Facebook becomes a valuable campaign tool.  Through the use of personalised advertising political parties are able to target a range of people.  While on social media, users may subconsciously engage with subliminal messaging which could influence their opinion and be the reason behind their own posts about a particular party.  With this level of potential influence it is important for political parties to stay in control of what is posted centrally.

Just as every press release would need to go through multiple approval levels, every Facebook post or Tweet should be managed using a social media risk management and compliance platform.  It only takes one incoherent political message to be sent out and that message to be quickly exposed through the power of social media  for a campaign to come crashing down.  So while social media could be regarded as the best thing since sliced bread – a sandwich eaten with a photographer nearby or one pint of beer too many can do untold damage if spread across social channels.

Dangerous to Ignore

Political parties ignore the power of social media at their peril.  As President Obama proved embracing social channels can deliver success, however, managing its power should be a priority.  As for whether social media can predict the result of this year’s General Election only time will tell and with weeks to go all the indications are that the outcome will be tight just as in 2010 and last year’s Scottish Referendum.  Watch this space.

References

(1)        www.pewinternet.org/data-trend/social-media/social-media-use-by-age-group/

(2)        www.mancunianmatters.co.uk/content/170473201-if-likes-were-seats-facebook-users-predict-ukiptory-coalition-general-election

(3)        www.pewinternet.org/2012/05/31/twitter-use-2012/

(4)        http://tiffanywmedia.com/lie-social-media/

About CrowdControlHQ

CrowdControlHQ is the UK’s leading social media risk management and compliance platform.  The online technology delivers social media control and compliance features, in parallel with social engagement and analytics, to provide a single dashboard for multichannel campaigns.

CrowdControlHQ was launched in 2009.  The product was born out of recognition that social media would one day be extensively adopted by UK organisations and tasked to deliver tremendous impact across marketing and customer service functions.  The business has received backing from angel investors including Midven and Finance Birmingham.

CrowdControlHQ services over 125 different clients across the public sector, finance and legal sectors plus many household brands including Experian, Serco and Mercedes-Benz South West.

For further information please visit www.crowdcontrolhq.com or contact:

Michelle Leavesley

Marketing Director

CrowdControlHQ

Email: michelle.leavesley@crowdcontrolhq.com

Press Contacts:

Mary Phillips/Andreina West

PR Artistry Limited

Tel: +44 (0)1491 639500

Email: mary@pra-ltd.co.uk

Follow CrowdControlHQ on Twitter https://twitter.com/CrowdControlHQ

Connect with CrowdControlHQ on Facebook at

https://en-gb.facebook.com/CrowdControlHQ

Join CrowdControlHQ’s LinkedIn community at    http://www.linkedin.com/company/crowdcontrolhq/products

Read more about CrowdControlHQ on our blog at http://www.crowdcontrolhq.com/latest/
End
Source:PR Artistry
Email:***@pra-ltd.co.uk
Tags:Social Media, General Election, Political Party, Facebook, Social Media Platform
Industry:Media, Software
Location:England
Account Email Address Verified     Account Phone Number Verified     Disclaimer     Report Abuse
PRA Limited PRs
Trending News
Most Viewed
Top Daily News



Like PRLog?
9K2K1K
Click to Share