Follow on Google News News By Tag * Productivity Research * Health Research * Productivity Measurement * Productivity Benchmarking * More Tags... Industry News News By Location Country(s) Industry News
Follow on Google News | Managers’ Staffing Responses to Absences Escalate as Duration Increases, Finds IBI StudyIntegrated Benefits Institute study finds actions range from doing nothing to assigning work to others, and bringing in substitute and replacement workers
By: Integrated Benefits Instiitute Managers are more likely to take no action if a worker’s absence is short (one to three days), but, as the duration of absence extends to two weeks or to one month, managers are increasingly willing to assign work to others, bring in substitute workers, increase the use of overtime and even hire new employees, according to the study. “All of these impacts—staff replacement, overtime, output delays and effects on team members—are associated with additional costs beyond the workers’ wages,” wrote IBI executive vice president Kimberly Jinnett, PhD, author of the study. Doing nothing could be costly as well, according to the study. When managers don’t respond, there are costs such as output delays and effects on team members because employers may allow work to go undone, rather than respond to shorter-duration absences. “Managers may assume that, for a short-duration absence, the absent worker can make up the time or the impact of lost work will be relatively low. But as duration increases, the impact becomes hard to ignore and the manager responds,” Jinnett added. According to the study findings, managers’ responses include the following actions: One day: At one day of absence, 82% of managers are most likely to do nothing in response; 9.5% assign the work to other employees and 9.5% use substitute workers. Three days: When the absence increases to three days, only 50% of managers do nothing; 29% assign work to other employees and 18% use substitute workers. Two weeks: When the absence grows to two weeks, managers most frequently assign work to other employees (58%), find substitute workers (18%) and use overtime (17%). Less than 7% of managers do nothing in response. One month: After a one-month absence, employers assigning work to other employees diminishes slightly (49%), while the use of substitute workers increases (28%). There is also an increase in the hiring of new employees (4%) and other management responses (6%). “Clearly, managers choose different responses to absence as the duration increases.Those choices have costs for the company as other workers are relied upon during normal working hours or through use of overtime to complete the work of the absent employee. Often, substitute workers may not have the level of training required to conduct the job at the same level as the absent worker and output delays may be expected,” Jinnett said. “To compete in an ever-increasingly globalized marketplace, employers need a healthy, highly-performing workforce and to minimize costs associated with ill health. Although most employers are well aware of the impact of poor health on medical costs, few have good measures of how health influences absence and job performance (aka presenteeism); The report is the first in a series from IBI’s ongoing study, “The Impact of Health on Job Performance and Productivity.” About the Integrated Benefits Institute The Integrated Benefits Institute (IBI), an independent nonprofit membership organization, is the leading provider of health and productivity research, measurement and benchmarking. Founded in 1995, IBI provides members with data, research and tools to make sound decisions in how they invest in the health of their workforces. Its 950 members include companies implementing health-related programs to benefit their employees and business, and providers of health and productivity services. Additional information about IBI may be found at http://www.ibiweb.org End
Account Email Address Account Phone Number Disclaimer Report Abuse
|
|