Weber, who is president of the Association of Mature American Citizens, noted that the White House has yet to nominate members of the IPAB. “Perhaps it’s because the pervasive and intrusive nature of the board would be exposed at a time when liberals can ill afford such disclosure. They’d be hard pressed to defend the so-called Death Panel come the November mid-term elections,” he said.
“Remember the promise that you could keep your doctor under Obamacare. Can we trust the promise that the IPAB will not ration health care for senior citizens?”
But, Weber, added it will be difficult to keep the panel and its extraordinary authority under wraps when Sylvia Mathews Burwell, who has been nominated to become the next Health and Human Services Secretary. She’ll undergo scrutiny in the Senate before she can be confirmed and the IPAB will be a topic of discussion, he pointed out.
“She could duck the issue, but it will be difficult for her to ignore the fact that along with becoming the new Secretary, she will also become the first and only member of the IPAB and that makes her appointment highly controversial.”
In a recent article published by Forbes, health care expert Michael Cannon wrote that “Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, if the Senate does not confirm any nominees to the Act’s 15-member Independent Payment Advisory Board, then all of the Board’s powers fall to the Secretary of Health and Human Services.”
Cannon is director of health policy studies at Cato Institute highly regarded as an expert on the Affordable Care Act. As he put it: “IPAB’s unelected members will have effectively unfettered power to impose taxes and ration care for all Americans, whether the government pays their medical bills or not.”
It’s a timely topic considering the fact that in June oral arguments will be heard by the 9th Circuit Court in a high profile law suit focused on the legitimacy of the IPAB. The plaintiff in the case, the Goldwater Institute, makes what it calls “the strongest legal challenge to date in Coons v. Geithner by arguing the federal health care law exceeds the powers of Congress and violates individual rights as well as violates the Separation of Powers doctrine.”
Weber said he believes the lawsuit could have a “chilling”
NOTE TO EDITORS: Dan Weber and Michael Young are available for telephone interviews on this issue. Editors and reporters may contact John Grimaldi by phone at 917-846-8485 or via email at email@example.com to set up a call.
The Association of Mature American Citizens [http://www.amac.us] is a vibrant, vital and conservative alternative to those organizations, such as AARP, that dominate the choices for mature Americans who want a say in the future of the nation. Where those other organizations may boast of their power to set the agendas for their memberships, AMAC takes its marching orders from its members. We act and speak on their behalf, protecting their interests, and offering a conservative insight on how to best solve the problems they face today. Live long and make a difference by joining us today at http://amac.us/
John Grimaldi Consulting
John Grimaldi Consulting