Follow on Google News News By Tag * Aca * Broadcasters * Retransmission Consent * Shared Services Agreeements * Collusion * Disclosure * More Tags... Industry News News By Location Country(s) Industry News
Follow on Google News | ACA Calls On FCC To Require Greater Transparency From TV Stations That Coordinate Retrans DealsAmerican Cable Association Says Sunlight Needed To Expose Broadcasters’ Private Price-Fixing Schemes
ACA said the FCC should require broadcasters to place in their online public file any agreement, regardless of name or purported "efficiencies," "Requiring disclosure of all agreements between separately owned TV stations in the same market, particularly those that facilitate the coordination of retransmission consent negotiations, would serve the public interest by enabling regulatory and antitrust authorities to both monitor the competitive effects of such agreements and detect violations of FCC regulations and federal antitrust statutes," ACA President and CEO Matthew M. Polka said. The coordinated negotiation of retransmission consent among separately owned, same-market broadcasters implicates three important public policy concerns: media consolidation, the exercise of retransmission consent and antitrust compliance. In multiple filings, ACA has recommended that the FCC deem this practice to be in violation of the local television ownership limits and of broadcasters' obligation to negotiate retransmission consent in good faith. Such coordinated retransmission consent negotiations reduce competition in local television markets and also result in higher costs to customers of pay-television providers. As ACA has documented in the past based on member surveys, the practice of coordinating retransmission consent negotiations between separately owned stations in the same market is widespread. "Disclosure of all agreements between separately owned, same-market stations in broadcasters' public inspection files is necessary because today the information needed to evaluate whether broadcasters are in compliance with current media ownership, retransmission consent, and antitrust rules is not otherwise readily available," Polka said. "The public needs to know whether broadcasters are trying to eliminate competition in local markets through collusion and drive up the prices pay-television providers pay to deliver free, over-the-air television to their customers." In comments filed with the FCC on Dec. 22, ACA noted that a requirement to place all agreements between separately owned, same-market stations in broadcasters' online public file would track with the rationale underlying prior FCC disclosure mandates. For example, FCC rules require the placement of Joint Sales and Time Brokerage Agreements (with confidential information redacted) in a broadcaster's public inspection file to evaluate whether these agreements effectively undercut FCC ownership restrictions. The Department of Justice (DOJ) filed comments with the FCC asserting that same-market JSAs should be considered attributable for ownership purposes on the basis of their competitive similarity to common equity ownership. DOJ said these agreements should be made available for public inspection. ACA stressed that DOJ's concerns about the anti-competitive effects of JSAs directly relate to the independent cable community's concerns about agreements between separately owned same-market broadcasters that facilitate the coordinated negotiation of retransmission consent. ACA believes that DOJ's successful effort with the FCC to require public file disclosure of broadcaster JSAs provides support for ACA's view that agreements among separately owned, same-market television broadcast stations that make possible coordinated broadcast carriage negotiations also should be placed in the broadcasters' online public file. About the American Cable Association: # # # ACA supports independent cable operators and their customers by promoting a legislative and regulatory environment that allows for a fair and competive marketplace and by providing the tools and information our members need to compete effectively End
Account Email Address Account Phone Number Disclaimer Report Abuse
|
|