1. Latest News
  2. Submit Press Release
Bioethics Defense Fund Logo

Brief: Obamacare Abortion Mandate Violates Free Exercise

Federal court brief reveals a significant new reason that Obamacare is unconstitutional: its abortion premium mandate violates the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment.

May 13, 2011 - PRLog -- Bioethics Defense Fund (BDF) has filed an amicus brief on behalf of three pro-life medical associations presenting a new and significant reason why the so-called Obamacare Act is unconstitutional: it imposes an “abortion premium mandate” that violates the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment.

The friend-of-the-court brief was filed in the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals in support of the twenty-six State Attorneys General, on behalf of the Catholic Medical Association, Christian Medical and Dental Association, and Medical Students for Life.

The brief is the first to oppose the individual mandate based on a detailed outline of the abortion provisions found in Section 1303 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Added on the Senate side as part of the “Nelson Compromise,” the provisions mandate that certain issuers “shall” obtain, without exception, a separate premium from each enrollee’s own pocket to be used solely for the payment of other people’s elective abortions.

Even though the language was intended to prohibit an individual’s use of government subsidies for abortion coverage, “Congress cannot meet that goal by unconstitutionally forcing Americans to personally foot the bill for abortion, in violation of their sincerely held religious beliefs,” said BDF president and general counsel Nikolas T. Nikas.

According to co-counsel Mark Rienzi of Columbus School of Law, “the Supreme Court has allowed government imposed burdens on free exercise only if the law is ‘neutral and generally applicable.’” But he says that the Act does not even come close to meeting that standard.

According to BDF senior counsel Dorinda C. Bordlee, “the individual mandate provides for limited religious exemptions – but only for those who religiously oppose insurance benefits, not abortion; and, the Health Secretary herself has issued hundreds of waivers to the individual mandate on a case by case basis. This shows that the law is not generally applicable and that Congress really has no compelling interest in forcing all Americans to purchase health insurance, especially when it forces them to personally pay a designated abortion premium.”

Bioethics Defense Fund senior counsel Dorinda C. Bordlee filed the brief as counsel of record, along with BDF general counsel Nikolas T. Nikas. Co-counsel include Mark Rienzi, Assistant Professor at the Columbus School of Law, Catholic University of America; Timothy J. Casey; and Christopher A. Ferrara of the American Catholic Lawyers Association.

FULL TEXT of BDF Amicus Brief here: http://www.bdfund.org/uploads/file_567.pdf  

SUMMARY ONLY here: http://www.bdfund.org/uploads/file_569.pdf

ON THE WEB at http://www.BDFund.org/ObamacareinCourt

Dorinda C. Bordlee
(504) 231-7234

# # #

Bioethics Defense Fund is a public-interest legal organization whose mission is to defend human life through strategic legislation, litigation, and public education on issues involving abortion, human embryo experimentation, euthanasia, and health care rights of conscience.

--- End ---

Click to Share

Contact Email:
***@bdfund.org Email Verified
Source:Bioethics Defense Fund, Dorinda Bordlee
Phone:(504) 231-7234
Location:Scottsdale - Arizona - United States
Industry:Legal, Religion, Government
Tags:Obamacare, Abortion, Individual Mandate, Ppaca, Vinson, Unconstitutional, Obama, Florida case, Appeal, Free Exercise
Verified Account Email Address
Verified Account Phone Number

Disclaimer:   Issuers of the press releases are solely responsible for the content of their press releases. PRLog can't be held liable for the content posted by others.   Report Abuse

Latest Press Releases By “


Trending News...

Like PRLog?
Click to Share