The Taxman Cometh [- possibly].

Hard on the heels of recent moves by HMRC affecting several million PAYE taxpayers who had innocently believed that they’d already paid all the tax they were supposed to have paid...
By: Andrew Patterson
 
Sept. 23, 2010 - PRLog -- ... only to find some unwelcome brown envelopes arriving in their post early one September morning, come rumours from some tax specialists that the Taxman’s next target will be small and medium businesses. The logic seems impeccable: with the Government about to announce the most swingeing public spending cuts in living memory, the other side of the ‘public finance equation’ is obviously to collect all of the tax revenue that is due. However, whereas the PAYE controversy was in one sense just a [very public -] ‘correction’ of previous administrative and calculation errors, the current speculation concerns an apparently renewed determination by the Treasury to ensure that businesses are playing by the rules as far as their basic tax computations are concerned, particularly areas such as VAT returns and end-of-year profit calculations.

Now on reflection those readers who’ve been in business for a long time [say twenty years or longer] might, however grudgingly, concede that they’ve seen a gradual decline in detailed scrutiny by various tax offices over that time. For example: anyone who ran a forecourt back in the 1980’s or 1990’s was quite used to seeing a VAT Inspector on site every eighteen months or so; those visits typically took at least half a day even for the simplest business, and usually involved a quite detailed comparison of the business bank account and sales and purchase records against the quarterly returns submitted since the last inspection. If all were generally ‘OK’ at that level, the visit would conclude with what became almost a ritual dance between The Inspector and The Proprietor revolving around small items of expenditure that may have been wholly for business purposes [-or not]: private phone bills; motor expenses; ‘staff lunches’; food stock written-off and consumed on site, etc. In most cases it was deemed safest to let the Inspector score a minor victory on something pretty small – like disallowing part of the VAT on the operator’s home telephone bills – so that honour could be satisfied, and then take them for a bite to eat at the nearest hostelry before they could stumble on something more interesting. Although few will openly admit it now, many accountants took a similar approach to the annual tax submissions for their clients; provide a lot of detail in those expense categories which were known to particularly interest Tax Inspectors [“Motor Expenses”, “Legal & Professional Fees” and the dreaded “Miscellaneous Expenses”] – agree to some small disallowance demanded by the Inspector in one of those areas, and the rest would probably go through without much more scrutiny.

Over time the VAT visits became less frequent, and indeed many forecourts haven’t seen a VAT Inspector in any official capacity for years, unless they’ve been in a situation where the business has just submitted a return that was going to result in a large refund of VAT. In some respects a parallel story developed with annual accounts; generally they seemed to be accepted without requests for further explanation or information – unless the Revenue were already suspicious of the trader’s activities in which case they might just initiate a much deeper inquiry into almost everything. Accountants spent hours preparing detailed analyses of various expenses only to find that in most cases the Revenue didn’t want to discuss them. On both sides the story tended towards ‘all or nothing’ – either the basic information supplied by the taxpayer was accepted without further query, or it went to the other extreme and a costly examination of all the figures ensued.

There may well be impeccable logic to having HMRC pay a bit closer scrutiny to the accounts and tax returns of all businesses, with the intention of collecting more tax for the Exchequer. It’s quite possible that some businesses have fallen into sloppy habits as far as their accounting and record-keeping procedures are concerned, since the chances of anyone ‘official’ turning up and demanding to see the books have been pretty slim over the last few years. Add to that the absence of any kind of financial ‘Audit’ for most small and medium businesses [even those trading as Limited Companies, with a turnover below £M 6.5 per year], as well as a tendency for many proprietors of such businesses to dispense with regular professional advice or even experienced bookkeeping staff as an economy measure, and there’s a good chance that their accounts and tax returns are slightly less than accurate – even if entirely innocently. However, as with all seemingly impeccable logic there’s always one big flaw.

The reason why the frequency of VAT inspections dwindled almost to insignificance, and the Revenue became increasingly relaxed about the quantity and quality of the information they received from thousands of small businesses over the last ten or fifteen years, was simply COST. Such attention required trained, experienced people at HMRC who were able to spend at least half a day per client out in the real world for a VAT visit, sometimes many miles from their offices; it meant tax inspectors who were given the time to go through each set of accounts with a fine tooth comb and contact the taxpayer and correspond with their accountant. Successive governments have demanded ‘efficiency’ – meaning fewer staff dealing with more cases, so the priority switched to larger targets that potentially could produce greater financial returns. Given that the Chancellor is expected to announce yet further cuts in civil service numbers, and assuming that it’s inconceivable for any Conservative Chancellor to announce something as radical as extending financial ‘Audit’ requirements to smaller businesses, it’s extremely difficult to see how the Treasury might expect to toughen-up compliance with tax measures. Still, you never know. It might just be prudent for some businesses out there to tidy-up their accounting and administration, seeking professional help if they don’t know how. Just in case. Before more brown envelopes drop through the letterbox.

# # #

EKW Group is recognised as a leading retail accountancy specialist and has been providing bureau and outsourced accounting and associated services to retail branded networks since 1935.
End
Source:Andrew Patterson
Email:***@ekwgroup.co.uk Email Verified
Zip:BL5 3AJ
Tags:Tax, Vat, Hmrc, Smes
Industry:Accounting, Business, Home business
Location:England
Account Email Address Verified     Disclaimer     Report Abuse
EKW Group PRs
Trending News
Most Viewed
Top Daily News



Like PRLog?
9K2K1K
Click to Share