Dr. Al Sears, who notes that Somers is the author of several best-selling books on the subject, says that she has “educated herself about the options for HRT" and he writes that he agrees with her that bioidenticals are a better option.
But why does he feel that bioidentical hormones are a better option that the synthetics?
As. Dr. Sears notes in his column (http://www.alsearsmd.com/
Conversely, Dr. Sears notes that synthetic HRT drugs have a whole array of reported risks, from:
• chest pain,
• shortness of breath,
• vision problems,
• breast lumps,
• dizziness and
• depression.
“Alleviating the symptoms of menopause can often result in something much, much worse if you take the synthetic form of the drugs,” he points out.
Moreover, a study of the Women’s Health Initiative evaluated women nation-wide who had taken a non-bioidentical estrogen-progestin combination drug called Prempro. The US National Institutes of Health had to cut the study short when their findings showed that the drug resulted in a
• 26% increase in breast cancer,
• 41% increase in strokes,
• 29% increase in heart attacks,
• 100% increase of blood clots in the legs and lungs, and
• increased risk of ovarian and endometrial cancer.
“Your body doesn’t see them (bioidenticals)
Dr. Sears stresses before you consider using any form of hormone treatment the importance of first having a physician check levels of estrogen, progesterone and testosterone in order to determine which hormones need replenishing.
Some doctors are unwilling to prescribe bioidenticals, but many are, particularly those who are well informed on the results of clinical trials, and current research findings into synthetics vs. bioidenticals.

