Now ask in Canada,
No. 1
Why does the government use subliminal wording to sway the public into believing nuclear is good?
Answer, Because the people reporting are all specialists in nuclear, and are only in favour of this type of power, Biased!
They cannot see the major flaw with nuclear. Have they all got bovine schizophrenia?
No. 2
We ask why have you got your facts screwed up?
answer, You are either in their back pockets hiding something, and swayed by the deception of descriptive words that these people have used. It is very evident in your e mails and letters sent out. You follow them like a little puppy dog they are training. eg, As an example of a subliminal wording " VALUE" as being used as a descriptive adjective. When you can not use this type of word when proof is not so. 3 mile island as 1 Chernobyl , and Kiev. Crack an egg and what happens? Anal retentive brains!
No.3
How can anyone support a project that has not had a group of educated parasite to do a specific research of facts against the said projects? There seems to be no reporting of flaws and failures of nuclear. Why?
No. 4
Has their been strong research into the facts of what happens with a severe ground shaking on loose grounds, and compare why the Japanese build their plants only on solid bedrock?
answer, They do this because they can get a good return on a Richter value to shut the system down. Whereas this is different on loose grounds as in this part of the prairies.
Which will have more effect to cause a sinking rather then a shift. Therefore there is a good possibility to have a leakage rather then not. Will this cause a melt down? Will this drift the effects into the United States? Wake up neighbors!
No.5
Which begs the question. When any major event does occur and say the operators on site get hurt. Then who's going to shut the plant down or repair or correct the situation at hand?
answer, No one will be educated enough to take the correct means. To many eggs in one basket. poor leadership!
Why compound the problem?
No. 6
Where is the report from the educated that we would have expected a well represent government should have done pointing out the cons rather then just the pros?
answer, There is non because you expected this would subliminally be forced on to everyone without us seeing the light., Someone was to quick to jump the gun!
No. 7
Where is the study equivalent of what would happen if an equal amount of grants were made for individuals to put up solar rather then just one Humpty Dumpty sitting on a wall looking for a place to fall and crack?
answer, There is non, Why? If there is It had to be poorly done or incomplete.
No. 8
Was there a study done to show how much power would be replaced if individual homes had their own power source?
No. 9
Where is the study what will happen if all the eggs are put in one basket? Will this show a gross problem of what happens when there is a major power failure like the north American continent has had in several places?
ans People will be without power for a longer then normal period, When the odds of a power failure of many thousand who are on their own power source.
Which begs the question
Why would some individuals would want to have a one source rather then sharing the rights with others?
N0. 10
Where is the study of odds etc what happens to the land when a leak or melt down occurs?
ans The results show there will be a problem even if it is huge. But it will happen, We are not immune. Why put all the eggs in one basket and have the possibility of cracking it?
No. 11
If the odds of having a accident is remote. This odds does not tell you if it will be now or later. It could be immediately after you open the doors. Why take the chance when you don't know if the odds are pro or con?
ans sorry the only answer one can see is someone is lining their pocket rather then having love in their heart for their fellow man. This is imposing the will of one individual on many others in opposition!
N0. 12
Where is the research speaking of the costs of increased in health on society? Have you got the odds of comparison with solar as with nuclear?
We believe you will find more stress related concerns. Why should anyone have the desires of someone Else's beliefs be pushed on others when there is other ways of skinning a cat?
No. 13
Where is the study of hidden costs?
No. 14
Why is it a fact that the cost of nuclear power will be as we heard 17 cents per kilowatt and who in their right mind would want to exchange 7 to 8 cents per kilowatt?
Have you asked the seniors and those on a fixed income if they would be in favour of this?
Has this been brought out in public?
No. 15
Why has someone wanted to shove this big bill on to an unsuspecting public with the looming economy falling world wide? Especially when this all started with a need from the tar sands needing more power. When we see and hear of lay offs from said and cut backs.
ans no body in their right mind would attempt to implement this without concern of future events being secured.
This if it fails this is left to the unsuspecting public to pay. While we stress the fact those who promoted this will have made many millions of dollars and will not have to pay in this future mess. Is that fair? To have those who promoted this walk free and leave those who cannot afford this will have to pay. Think someone has their brains become part of a anal retentive source?
No. 16
Last but not least why after being contacted have you and your government including C.B.C. and C.T.V. not replied to a simple request to help make people aware of the research of CMA energy being done?
